Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops

["George, Wes" <[e-mail]>]

> From: [e-mail]

> there were a slew of changes (or a slew of comments made) requested, a
> document update happened ~13 days ago, did the changes account for the
> comments/requests or not?
>

[WEG] I diffed 11 and 12 when 12 came out, and no, not really. As I recall, Shane already replied that the proposed text (that made it into -12) was not adequate in explaining rationale around the recommendation of "close" for RPKI cache placement, among other things. (cf. emails on 10/31). Don't know if additional changes are pending for -13 based on those comments, but the mail thread died on the 31st with no further responses.

Wes George

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.