Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun

[Randy Bush <[e-mail]>]

>> well, actually, the discussion in april was walking around many of
>> the implications thereof.  it is hard to discuss "do we keep/replace
>> AS[4]_PATH" as it is abstract and draws deep philosophical discourse
>> with no hard handles on technical decision points.
> 
> I think you should remove the [4] from the discussion. 4 bytes ASN is
> mandatory for BGPSEC speakers. So, there should be no AS4_PATH
> attributes between BGPSEC routers to keep/replace.

i agree.  but every time i say AS_PATH someone whacks me with AS4_PATH.
maybe this is why i like the NO_EXPLICIT_PATH :)

randy