IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun

Shane Amante <shane@castlepoint.net> Thu, 24 May 2012 01:14 UTC

Return-Path: <shane@castlepoint.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA90321F84D6 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 18:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ikZpsKPWs-74 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 18:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dog.tcb.net (dog.tcb.net [64.78.150.133]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C9D21F842C for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 May 2012 18:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dog.tcb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id D89AC268063; Wed, 23 May 2012 19:14:47 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from mbpw.castlepoint.net (174-29-213-45.hlrn.qwest.net [174.29.213.45]) (authenticated-user smtp) (TLSv1/SSLv3 AES128-SHA 128/128) by dog.tcb.net with SMTP; Wed, 23 May 2012 19:14:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from shane@castlepoint.net)
X-Avenger: version=0.7.8; receiver=dog.tcb.net; client-ip=174.29.213.45; client-port=57974; syn-fingerprint=65535:54:1:64:M1452,N,W1,N,N,T,S; data-bytes=0
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Shane Amante <shane@castlepoint.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2pq9u75cq.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 19:14:28 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5DDBFDFB-0A6B-4830-AAFF-361F8B7AA500@castlepoint.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60F70A267@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <m2mx4y8s98.wl%randy@psg.com> <43DD8E9F-2482-4E0E-B187-CCF7DE534D2E@castlepoint.net> <m2txz675ya.wl%randy@psg.com> <F6079B5D-86BC-46DB-B961-5E71672A8A86@castlepoint.net> <m2pq9u75cq.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 01:14:48 -0000

On May 23, 2012, at 7:08 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>> Can you expound more what you mean by "aliasing" above?  Do you mean
>>>> local-as, etc.
>>> yep
> 
>> That's strange.  Why doesn't the following comment to the list back in
>> March of this year count as "no comments on list to ... aliasing"?
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04093.html
> 
> it counted so much we spent a good bit of time on it in the april
> meeting.  we, possibly foolishly, thought we had local convergence.


For those of us who did not attend the April interim meeting, can you point to where the list was asked if they agreed with the "local convergence"?

-shane

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email