Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun

"George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com> Thu, 24 May 2012 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <wesley.george@twcable.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3184821F84E6 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.963
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.963 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NiDlqaMdk-Zn for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cdpipgw01.twcable.com (cdpipgw01.twcable.com [165.237.59.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4443C21F84D8 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-SENDER-IP: 10.136.163.13
X-SENDER-REPUTATION: None
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,651,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="385472299"
Received: from unknown (HELO PRVPEXHUB04.corp.twcable.com) ([10.136.163.13]) by cdpipgw01.twcable.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 24 May 2012 09:19:33 -0400
Received: from PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.26]) by PRVPEXHUB04.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.13]) with mapi; Thu, 24 May 2012 09:19:57 -0400
From: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:19:56 -0400
Thread-Topic: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun
Thread-Index: Ac05MKfpRkK4d7aARcCMmxA94ZEx2wAfbtIQ
Message-ID: <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD465693779174280A8F4@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60F70A267@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <m2mx4y8s98.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2mx4y8s98.wl%randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:19:59 -0000

> From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Randy Bush
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 6:09 PM
> To: Murphy, Sandra
> Cc: sidr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun
>
> > In the interim in San Diego, there were requests (from operators) that
> > guidance to operators of how to provision a router with the needed
> > keys would be a good idea.  We had some discussion in the Paris
> > meeting of two drafts discussing provisioning the routers with their
> > needed private keys.  There's also been a recent flurry of discussion
> > on the list.
>
> no comments on the new version of draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying-00.txt.
> would appreciate some now or we can ask for wglc.
>

[WEG] We're again having an interim collocated with NANOG, ostensibly to gain additional operator participation (as well as batch travel).
However, in order to gain any benefit from the location, we probably need to publicize the interim on the NANOG list, though the window for doing it before travel plans are made is probably closing/closed.
Wasn't it on the NANOG agenda in SD? It's not this time...
It may even be useful to have a set of questions to fire off in a lightning talk regarding the things we plan to discuss in more detail over the course of the interim, so that people who have opinions on the matters can weigh in.

Wes George

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.