Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 22 May 2012 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E4021F85E5 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2012 14:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.294
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.294 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.305, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oVJgrU-e3BWa for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 May 2012 14:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEB721F85C7 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 May 2012 14:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1SWwZm-000AXK-P2; Tue, 22 May 2012 21:25:06 +0000
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 06:25:05 +0900
Message-ID: <m2r4ub7vta.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Matt Lepinski <mlepinski@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FBBB6D1.9000008@bbn.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60F70A267@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F0975D@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <4FBBB6D1.9000008@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 21:25:08 -0000

> In my opinion the biggest open issue in the bgpsec protocol draft is the 
> confederation issue that we discussed at the previous interim. (That is, 
> if we don't include AS4_Path or AS_Path in a bgpsec signed update, then 
> we need to somehow encode the information that would be in the 
> AS_confed_sequence segments of the AS_Path.)

i thought we were cheerily dumping as_confed_seq and thereby getting rid
of the last sequence.  essentially 
  o you are at the border about to send to an external peer
  o stepping back down the sigs, possibly zero times
  o there will be a sig from an external peer to the confed as
  o strip off all sigs subsequent to that one, if any
  o sign from the confed as to the external peer

randy