IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Wed, 28 July 2021 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072353A2251 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQELB9lM6cjH for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F343A224F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Lear-Air.local ([IPv6:2a02:aa15:4101:2a80:391f:2730:ce6:3195]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 16S82pww068779 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:02:53 +0200
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1627459374; bh=T5ui7l87cCXhM9mXG0sAP3hkBS2U54A2fuIPfKrgoB4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=nbv3VL6dMWXsH3hoZHIQiUJFtsfaT4M3w5VnyecIqb9eW5hZWnZYHeb/5F4+xOC7k Nh1odMYa2vR635bFZIYdMLtRW5jDjqsyvl2eXyupj3G5t/FBqsatAfnB/L2Em9qsJR d1aycCo2zxh4dVhTunttcPTeNG913e7mL674idC0=
To: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>, Tomofumi Okubo <tomofumi.okubo@digicert.com>
Cc: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <CD589623-52EE-4958-80AB-73F0CFB3A36E@vigilsec.com> <CAErg=HF_hcXO=9=KJh5EBEov4ybS_8g4xF=cANL9+83UvP0zvQ@mail.gmail.com> <adf86f46-093f-756f-8292-9b5e088f4344@lear.ch> <CAErg=HEUFV2F8R8g8e6yCDKz_e6RebNyB5Zb2Lvgn4oc3BtE-w@mail.gmail.com> <CO6PR14MB4468A7A5EB138542CEBA5D9CEAE99@CO6PR14MB4468.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CAErg=HH4aDgju=8C7Neq_4H19EX8S2inNd9fMAMYH3h95S48Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CO6PR14MB44688BC4188063BCA54E80C4EAE99@CO6PR14MB4468.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CAErg=HGDA+16N4xhgMvuQz25DqD+_nkiFC+OuAJMkFzYYqFV0w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Message-ID: <2550c1c3-1400-b380-c9ad-dad59286feee@lear.ch>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:02:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAErg=HGDA+16N4xhgMvuQz25DqD+_nkiFC+OuAJMkFzYYqFV0w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r6za5vhqbceljP0mGGjHril0mU2hYSzDd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/9AAKvgSevFl-ebrLEu4f6-69bBQ>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:03:12 -0000

How about the second paragraph:

> The LAMPS (Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME) Working
> Group is chartered to make updates where there is a known constituency
> interested in real deployment and there is at least one sufficiently
> well specified approach to the update so that the working group can
> sensibly evaluate whether to adopt a proposal.

Eliot

On 28.07.21 03:32, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 6:31 PM Tomofumi Okubo 
> <tomofumi.okubo@digicert.com <mailto:tomofumi.okubo@digicert.com>> wrote:
>
>     The section will be referring to an existing RFC which is
>     currently in use.
>
> I eagerly anticipate waiting to see which part of the charter [1] 
> you’re proposing this new work item fits under.
>
> I cannot help but still be concerned, despite the stated belief, that 
> is is a clear abrogation of the following language from the charter:
>
> The LAMPS WG may produce
> clarifications where needed, but the LAMPS WG shall not adopt
> anything beyond clarifications without rechartering.
>
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lamps/about/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lamps/about/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email