Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com> Wed, 28 July 2021 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ryan.sleevi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B136C3A162A for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MVld2XTmKWTd for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-f42.google.com (mail-pj1-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9EB13A16C3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-f42.google.com with SMTP id o44-20020a17090a0a2fb0290176ca3e5a2fso4840588pjo.1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SXBLviAVohLPzQNa9rB2yCixaJok9jlirY6MZu94g0o=; b=hQjMNMNwK3f/JTCQdihKq6OAozGWzD4AZpUigbfX4Aj0f1JpFk+8ckHMVj4odsKw04 Q3D1sbn3TsPRGQFHDcwYQABglgSjYQnGXIxcFjf/H97LyjVyBwObgewo84qS0Ge3qJ1N yZkd8qH/FLTRQa7vF4+mXlk8+1UZflcT/tvYR4/63wgm8b7KBaCK/hgEazcfwO8DVmed 6R2tG9+KP9Wl7Unrsr8Chb92ac4QDEcFSMN2cxgaxUBYJlNvXdiC2N32f7a8UfQFCPk3 4IGpJzCGp0KqS6Lb69fj2MO46wswAzpD0EYl7yYt1oIkHGJh5i/2Y7XLLttN61vHi4bl vV5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332h2LcBTlSSqSrn2U6jNy2WLypjZeJH2iIRKQfc8ttztF748zF FnylKknK0Gt8Npnat1N9S1LduHpkqLU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4oUz9A8oY4ErbWOKXkWRDnsx6v2/76xo69+xLme4UnqLneZF9wnK5Hv8SJ2atLQ5TbBaXig==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:940e:: with SMTP id r14mr10202753pjo.41.1627488668773; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com (mail-pl1-f175.google.com. [209.85.214.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm420751pfw.171.2021.07.28.09.11.08 for <spasm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id z3so1940743plg.8 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a62:b615:0:b029:34a:3920:a7ea with SMTP id j21-20020a62b6150000b029034a3920a7eamr607471pff.21.1627488668085; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CD589623-52EE-4958-80AB-73F0CFB3A36E@vigilsec.com> <CAErg=HF_hcXO=9=KJh5EBEov4ybS_8g4xF=cANL9+83UvP0zvQ@mail.gmail.com> <adf86f46-093f-756f-8292-9b5e088f4344@lear.ch> <CAErg=HEUFV2F8R8g8e6yCDKz_e6RebNyB5Zb2Lvgn4oc3BtE-w@mail.gmail.com> <CO6PR14MB4468A7A5EB138542CEBA5D9CEAE99@CO6PR14MB4468.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CAErg=HH4aDgju=8C7Neq_4H19EX8S2inNd9fMAMYH3h95S48Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CO6PR14MB44688BC4188063BCA54E80C4EAE99@CO6PR14MB4468.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CAErg=HGDA+16N4xhgMvuQz25DqD+_nkiFC+OuAJMkFzYYqFV0w@mail.gmail.com> <2550c1c3-1400-b380-c9ad-dad59286feee@lear.ch> <CAErg=HGnKMNNyaf-=w+DmqfXg7XYbKD2Ah-WUxf96xNN5Ecikg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAErg=HGnKMNNyaf-=w+DmqfXg7XYbKD2Ah-WUxf96xNN5Ecikg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:10:57 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAErg=HFVx5JTog5_aWOrx3vAm5o=LxHfwxEqkVM8FifYCm2P+A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAErg=HFVx5JTog5_aWOrx3vAm5o=LxHfwxEqkVM8FifYCm2P+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, Tomofumi Okubo <tomofumi.okubo@digicert.com>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eff3ed05c8313b64"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/oN5sKVf_QFT0PI19toV0ESl1ihk>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:11:24 -0000

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:01 AM Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com> wrote:

> [5]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/c8aIik0B_7WOaBdGuiURrkvE_h0/
>

Sorry, bad paste buffer - this should have been the parent message,
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/tpTT2hAxqylJh56bTtY9hD1W6yk/ ,
which captures this past discussion about "EKU for industry" vs "EKU for
protocol"