IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com> Tue, 27 July 2021 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ryan.sleevi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2C93A0AF7 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yx1qxGTrYPV3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-f44.google.com (mail-pj1-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30CA63A0AF3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-f44.google.com with SMTP id q17-20020a17090a2e11b02901757deaf2c8so1440107pjd.0 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qzT/Bn3bNgoYiIz8Qn0OK82FPU4oxEbIxSYmJXOKWcQ=; b=SDrk7vNVj5wcUsySjIgAfxdYsyGp0jTyCCccPma29IslqDhC3VNaEX4DqyWNJZh8aR NwdQ3sKFmJMuLwUd8yEWLEx3zj70bNSnqSLWLgQiyh0k3QV0G9FvMdEhCwZH13OoOPmC YUr5eRM3LbX6xY90NiA1RuVkIYlkAqVGNyQVmkHj/VV6sloZr5aDr9zoI+C2YdWm+0Sn BiwRcD8OIPOFpgcuccG4aylaqztMyNwElaVpXqCefgAhbcNunAN/64UG4qaMNxBISSeS KAKEmea238ZrNzVY/WpW1TclRBA9n4W28G0nGw2TNSpQl1wY6ixVSVrv2HIbKXsKqyFV wUMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5333Cxc33cVlgsqw0PNP5PSzpvOIpWuqObFROKj2vUCIX7d809Kc 8sgG41zt5nM3kvMU6GQoqwV1b2GSdS8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxC5LKx7bR4NsmcyeS4R4tegQDiLaln600J/r2ZIOZ7g/tbzHWNKFHVjdRRK9xYX8ey52kDaQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:2513:: with SMTP id ns19mr6129222pjb.63.1627423672355; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com (mail-pl1-f170.google.com. [209.85.214.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g71sm4781217pfb.139.2021.07.27.15.07.51 for <spasm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id t21so150007plr.13 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a41:b029:12b:8e55:d2b1 with SMTP id x1-20020a1709029a41b029012b8e55d2b1mr20459477plv.78.1627423671583; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CD589623-52EE-4958-80AB-73F0CFB3A36E@vigilsec.com> <CAErg=HF_hcXO=9=KJh5EBEov4ybS_8g4xF=cANL9+83UvP0zvQ@mail.gmail.com> <adf86f46-093f-756f-8292-9b5e088f4344@lear.ch> <CAErg=HEUFV2F8R8g8e6yCDKz_e6RebNyB5Zb2Lvgn4oc3BtE-w@mail.gmail.com> <CO6PR14MB4468A7A5EB138542CEBA5D9CEAE99@CO6PR14MB4468.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR14MB4468A7A5EB138542CEBA5D9CEAE99@CO6PR14MB4468.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:07:40 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAErg=HH4aDgju=8C7Neq_4H19EX8S2inNd9fMAMYH3h95S48Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAErg=HH4aDgju=8C7Neq_4H19EX8S2inNd9fMAMYH3h95S48Rg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tomofumi Okubo <tomofumi.okubo@digicert.com>
Cc: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d80bba05c8221912"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/uXHA99igIN1mXm8jmnAgaAy-_G4>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 22:07:58 -0000

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 3:33 PM Tomofumi Okubo <tomofumi.okubo@digicert.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the input Ryan.
>
> We intend to add a section that addresses how the relying party can tell
> whether the EKU applies to a particular situation.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tomofumi
>

Will it resolve the charter issue? Am I mistaken in believing there is a
charter issue at play here?

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email