IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Santosh Chokhani <santosh.chokhani@gmail.com> Wed, 28 July 2021 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <santosh.chokhani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F64E3A23DB for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PrzPuC2sacZd for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x833.google.com (mail-qt1-x833.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::833]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2123A23D6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x833.google.com with SMTP id k13so2514494qth.10 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=HvlUan4SEyI3jrhH0JU2ZVlufu+73YA83F71q0bqS3A=; b=HsSuUuFhYwdGBIPP5/BfRSCfDpa4xsVFKjY2iqjGrWimMGCUcb7Ogd1WcByFjPZWdZ j0nTZrH7Kz/DLX6oqKLYO0udddqK5h9E3+MZaeBKa41M/B4HH4+FmTRVk1VLUFBVx1eZ 7Wpn+KHbpMQGUJIyHGELLoDFFAmtp5mRk5VQ2xC8v0AFzxfGnGPH3FlnNr8KUf7qqtKg kOdL+UrScOlvJjiEaLLSceTJ4Z41NLyVcGNbEpKuE0ZkVVB6LKQL+as0SrZ8LjuhXNRh If8CQYxbSn6ns0yXvfFZs6+A3G0I1QZbo0YIYv2VZv43miUbEoEtUsxOgFLth+6LksZu Zq9Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=HvlUan4SEyI3jrhH0JU2ZVlufu+73YA83F71q0bqS3A=; b=iK50CqantHWV6HAN7872KkXSkJ3yXol5qMlP8br6EJORb9Xt35Yf1Y424WhXm4Hf0/ s9gRg3RQlpQ8XVNdDOM/PNYXBKAPwUP73pr66hCurIvkyX1S4Imhg8n2dvc9CFyLonJU cbU/AenKl2clAHbKQk+1kxg4LWdYCw7KJM38WgRHNfeFyzYkmY8Xumsrw6iu2S3rFUKM FPe5gO9bP0sPYLuJzddZEl2VL3y5i/l5SqhbXBOv6lX60C4/DkAbRTUnbVqEcJyudF1Y 22Md5qT+k6D9Ef6Cz5KSwJSFRq1X8Ivfw/wwpPl6Hf5/8PFIVROskgLPy+qR9eMKtd9p v0Uw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gguL1CfL4M2Fq4QE3Zi0srkx6p0Z6Biq92M6kus3cX6G/ysq/ IwNN3WJ/WCagWFUIvjyC9vg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy99h9EwAO/U6C11UKjpzpWcmmkkFflBVcl+3v9SZPQ14oAfyzBRw3VxL62sbLoQ4UCw5t29g==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7645:: with SMTP id i5mr1612533qtr.133.1627510468810; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SantoshBrain (pool-173-73-187-14.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [173.73.187.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t8sm501433qtq.28.2021.07.28.15.14.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Santosh Chokhani <santosh.chokhani@gmail.com>
To: 'Eliot Lear' <lear@lear.ch>, 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>, 'LAMPS WG' <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <CD589623-52EE-4958-80AB-73F0CFB3A36E@vigilsec.com> <19561F5C-1EED-4D7E-81EB-210A2B47556C@vigilsec.com> <1fd42ccd-4440-fdf8-acc3-02724beea9ba@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <1fd42ccd-4440-fdf8-acc3-02724beea9ba@lear.ch>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:14:29 -0400
Message-ID: <0b0101d783fd$efa8a350$cef9e9f0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQF5ECxYRNC1uBLime5WMaZ2aDKrIwKa1u+KAeGXw16r8fRxMA==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/oXvyCpV8gNkcL0oKG0qfYeDDY3E>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 22:14:36 -0000

Russ,

I do not support adoption of this work.  A need has not been clearly demonstrated in the document.

Separately, and not related to adoption, the document is technically erroneous, flawed and incomplete.

-----Original Message-----
From: Spasm [mailto:spasm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eliot Lear
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 5:18 PM
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>; LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

I continue to support the work, and the recharter.

Eliot

On 28.07.21 23:13, Russ Housley wrote:
> After consultation with the Security AD for this group, a small recharter is necessary to adopt this document.
>
> So, I amend this call for adoption as follows:
>
> Please send your reply about whether you support adopting draft-ito-documentsigning-eku as a WG document after a recharter.  Please voice your support or raise concerns by 14 August 2021.
>
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ
>
>
>> On Jul 26, 2021, at 6:13 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>>
>> We have already discussing the assignment of an object identifier for document signing, and we had a presentation at IETF 111.  Following the IETF 111 presentation, no one spoke against against adoption of this work.  This call is to see if there is rough consensus for the LAMPS WG to proceed with this work.
>>
>> Please send your reply about whether you support adopting draft-ito-documentsigning-eku as a WG document.  Please voice your support or raise concerns by 14 August 2021.
>>
>> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
>> Russ
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spasm mailing list
>> Spasm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email