IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp> Thu, 11 November 2021 02:58 UTC

Return-Path: <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7D23A1620 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:58:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5nQprDSJlTgb for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:58:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from off-send41.osa.jprs.co.jp (off-send41.osa.jprs.co.jp [IPv6:2001:218:3001:17::50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EB43A161F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:58:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp (off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp [172.23.8.161]) by off-send41.osa.jprs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD368402F59 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:58:19 +0900 (JST)
Received: from off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss91 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43145602408E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:58:19 +0900 (JST)
Received: from NOTE1020.JPRS (off-cpu07.osa.jprs.co.jp [172.23.4.17]) by off-sendsmg31.osa.jprs.co.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 25C5B6022ECD for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:58:19 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:58:18 +0900
From: Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <20211111115818.1ffeeea5f2550760d5862e75@jprs.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <1739DC01-D237-4080-99F2-1B82A4571C49@vigilsec.com>
References: <CD589623-52EE-4958-80AB-73F0CFB3A36E@vigilsec.com> <1739DC01-D237-4080-99F2-1B82A4571C49@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-9.1.0.1373-8.6.0.1018-26522.004
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.769-5.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.769-5.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSS-9.1.0.1373-8.6.1018-26522.004
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.768900-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: rYoCTyAlGDFITndh1lLRAe5i6weAmSDKWDesRNOOJ5S4gUyzJIDbFgYj +P9XfeSQ/ye/3Hc9K1pO6yZaQQIeEz3qUaC7D/bCseLlFiOdASi0P8vH4t+8S/kuQv9PIVnNjDR m5pujAEl5leSxyd4fuRaIBhYUPy75fMtPKlH8m8gX6pCkJZNSOf6lpfpte41h1NIN1XHyeO7B3D S57bMZjbUfe90t1n+SYEVi84IeX8ZEVewvaIzmdcXt33YIQlY7OhJ9m53n4aDe6dEbvIyrxZy8U G+qg0r7gQTldZUDzJLCOQGQl9/u3RgHZ8655DOPOX/V8P8ail3InWAWA4yE6eunGEBqPil+pEmI v6Iva04LbigRnpKlKZx+7GyJjhAUIin3lDtJ/oTpLqx9uPG7hoys+A/xzsnBDiO7CzgNSuzdf6x +DAhJgfyI+1tLUV2s0rOBjxyZPEmpJtARF+vIiC1sCjxrYka9+g8G88C+6R/IjIBRiP/MR6BIQL G447onI2xDG5zjMKcchXTZ3Wukbw==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/G-o8FHMp8F5AvkxYG5864Iwq23o>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 02:58:29 -0000

I support for WG adoption.

Yoshiro YONEYA

On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:06:45 -0500 Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> We have already discussing the assignment of an object identifier for document signing.  An earlier call for document adoption lead to a lot of comments.  We had a presentation at IETF 112, and the authors reported that they have clarified what is meant by document signing, added a section for how to use the public key and certificate, addressed concerns about the extended key usage as a policy identifier, and expanded the security considerations.  Following the IETF 112 presentation, no one spoke against against adoption of this document.  This call is to see if there is rough consensus for the LAMPS WG to proceed with adoption of the revised document.
> 
> Please send your reply about whether you support adopting draft-ito-documentsigning-eku as a WG document.  Please voice your support or raise concerns by 30 November 2021.
> 
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email