IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Wed, 28 July 2021 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E302B3A20FF for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.091
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.091 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nTWK4qZ9Y2NF for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE673A2101 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:aa15:4101:2a80:2951:2495:143a:1c26] ([IPv6:2a02:aa15:4101:2a80:2951:2495:143a:1c26]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 16SLIHZk076926 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:18:17 +0200
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1627507097; bh=jX+Gt9TCzQdmW1dbnw2pIkOX2tbmw3rm9JOe/dnZEYQ=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LfTtEsDZQaOERbmZcBX28BDwlm76GIdqmrXDoKJTRsPb0prSp0Q4hP2KcNTOBXSbP MxJcbXjSiLHpHJTyXSdikOQFaXMHAi7ibM0ZBMqLn9ubGWL5cumYeJbybDKKAPFEZs HgyoyDC7vqjqtthIrNnOsy5mezhZGnLkdgA0kBOk=
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <CD589623-52EE-4958-80AB-73F0CFB3A36E@vigilsec.com> <19561F5C-1EED-4D7E-81EB-210A2B47556C@vigilsec.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Message-ID: <1fd42ccd-4440-fdf8-acc3-02724beea9ba@lear.ch>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:18:16 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19561F5C-1EED-4D7E-81EB-210A2B47556C@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GUtL3eMVNb3ZaFYlj9aWtcEGWNvtGn8Ry"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/prG5xVSqmSnXC6EBTHLszCXgf1E>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:18:26 -0000

I continue to support the work, and the recharter.

Eliot

On 28.07.21 23:13, Russ Housley wrote:
> After consultation with the Security AD for this group, a small recharter is necessary to adopt this document.
>
> So, I amend this call for adoption as follows:
>
> Please send your reply about whether you support adopting draft-ito-documentsigning-eku as a WG document after a recharter.  Please voice your support or raise concerns by 14 August 2021.
>
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ
>
>
>> On Jul 26, 2021, at 6:13 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>>
>> We have already discussing the assignment of an object identifier for document signing, and we had a presentation at IETF 111.  Following the IETF 111 presentation, no one spoke against against adoption of this work.  This call is to see if there is rough consensus for the LAMPS WG to proceed with this work.
>>
>> Please send your reply about whether you support adopting draft-ito-documentsigning-eku as a WG document.  Please voice your support or raise concerns by 14 August 2021.
>>
>> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
>> Russ
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spasm mailing list
>> Spasm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email