IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 01 December 2021 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1737D3A0B85 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:22:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K_uLEFK9siYq for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:22:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B4263A0B4A for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:22:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899E3300BDE for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:22:47 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id MqbX283GvRFa for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:22:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C080300A1C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:22:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:22:42 -0500
References: <CD589623-52EE-4958-80AB-73F0CFB3A36E@vigilsec.com> <1739DC01-D237-4080-99F2-1B82A4571C49@vigilsec.com>
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <1739DC01-D237-4080-99F2-1B82A4571C49@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <30989087-E5C2-446C-9547-122032F60FE8@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Yi4p1xZMUN6iyDJzsbUlYmP8G00>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 21:22:53 -0000

Tim and I just talked on the phone.  We both agree that there is consensus to adopt this document.  In fact, the discussion about what ought to go into the section on transition and interoperability has started.

Authors, please post draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku ...

For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
  Russ


> On Nov 10, 2021, at 5:06 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> We have already discussing the assignment of an object identifier for document signing.  An earlier call for document adoption lead to a lot of comments.  We had a presentation at IETF 112, and the authors reported that they have clarified what is meant by document signing, added a section for how to use the public key and certificate, addressed concerns about the extended key usage as a policy identifier, and expanded the security considerations.  Following the IETF 112 presentation, no one spoke against against adoption of this document.  This call is to see if there is rough consensus for the LAMPS WG to proceed with adoption of the revised document.
> 
> Please send your reply about whether you support adopting draft-ito-documentsigning-eku as a WG document.  Please voice your support or raise concerns by 30 November 2021.
> 
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email