IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 26 July 2021 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA313A14C1 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JiIaJo7mO_jG for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBCCA3A155B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886D3300BD6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:13:12 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id CGGhe1f9pn7P for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:13:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 888C7300B8C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:13:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Message-Id: <CD589623-52EE-4958-80AB-73F0CFB3A36E@vigilsec.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:13:10 -0400
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Ix2QfVLyWDBLtph4XLXVRuC-Mes>
Subject: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 22:13:16 -0000

We have already discussing the assignment of an object identifier for document signing, and we had a presentation at IETF 111.  Following the IETF 111 presentation, no one spoke against against adoption of this work.  This call is to see if there is rough consensus for the LAMPS WG to proceed with this work.

Please send your reply about whether you support adopting draft-ito-documentsigning-eku as a WG document.  Please voice your support or raise concerns by 14 August 2021.

For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email