IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com> Wed, 28 July 2021 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ryan.sleevi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641C83A156C for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cjcsebadkE22 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-f43.google.com (mail-pj1-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73B2D3A156B for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-f43.google.com with SMTP id j1so2710901pjv.3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gpZTJ8Fp0byMk7/lFqfrJNFO/sWb2Ac6x0PM9yTOLQ8=; b=RI+vla5O7tfIcjVN9stGvAT6HjQOfVBmRvLyK5NPIT6NkbaVQUvfC2rx5YsQ8fZqGM Y4Ofwomwh4hWVV1mEIKbS2//dXN04O5jo6mKL7/aMuWStbJMTPA2Yt+7U1D5E12+dFNg cdcvEGZu9tyCGV8JEy/iw4IsxZjocUs5H+vkP8j2xr6hMg9lMmYEW27UgUsM+Sbz/tdY 8JSDkca4K/twpTZFmTaG+WOtOmeo+Z+6RtAwikN46w+4dHLExFC0LQXoGH96h1HoFWmo yiBC1ntp8HinIoCBluGIYPPnD3NPQYddOwpzJ2Rt7aSuAhhtcFTYKM2dJhEPDZwiVlrR yrTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gMIhqJStbgOW0ch/XyAiANZp5tRFXBgRPXWRxP9Ko2oE44d6x M8gpN0zfGJBRqsDEJCBY7bGSSB8H0/I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwoxAQk9zSAEEeUVvWqTlrDWcrebPndKfMTQl3c8rJZz+LlmlbXcgMt/DQwlkkFgACQ1le93Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5509:: with SMTP id j9mr2253381pgb.329.1627435988769; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-f42.google.com (mail-pj1-f42.google.com. [209.85.216.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e12sm5058206pfc.214.2021.07.27.18.33.08 for <spasm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-f42.google.com with SMTP id mz5-20020a17090b3785b0290176ecf64922so7562308pjb.3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a63:cd4d:: with SMTP id a13mr26303861pgj.364.1627435988020; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CD589623-52EE-4958-80AB-73F0CFB3A36E@vigilsec.com> <CAErg=HF_hcXO=9=KJh5EBEov4ybS_8g4xF=cANL9+83UvP0zvQ@mail.gmail.com> <adf86f46-093f-756f-8292-9b5e088f4344@lear.ch> <CAErg=HEUFV2F8R8g8e6yCDKz_e6RebNyB5Zb2Lvgn4oc3BtE-w@mail.gmail.com> <CO6PR14MB4468A7A5EB138542CEBA5D9CEAE99@CO6PR14MB4468.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CAErg=HH4aDgju=8C7Neq_4H19EX8S2inNd9fMAMYH3h95S48Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CO6PR14MB44688BC4188063BCA54E80C4EAE99@CO6PR14MB4468.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR14MB44688BC4188063BCA54E80C4EAE99@CO6PR14MB4468.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 21:32:56 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAErg=HGDA+16N4xhgMvuQz25DqD+_nkiFC+OuAJMkFzYYqFV0w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAErg=HGDA+16N4xhgMvuQz25DqD+_nkiFC+OuAJMkFzYYqFV0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tomofumi Okubo <tomofumi.okubo@digicert.com>
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f5f1d505c824f7d9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/KH1T4fKvLf10Ua6sdgn8uzhMN9Q>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:33:14 -0000

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 6:31 PM Tomofumi Okubo <tomofumi.okubo@digicert.com>
wrote:

> The section will be referring to an existing RFC which is currently in use.
>
I eagerly anticipate waiting to see which part of the charter [1] you’re
proposing this new work item fits under.

I cannot help but still be concerned, despite the stated belief, that is is
a clear abrogation of the following language from the charter:

The LAMPS WG may produce
clarifications where needed, but the LAMPS WG shall not adopt
anything beyond clarifications without rechartering.

[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lamps/about/

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email