IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com> Thu, 29 July 2021 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE033A13C3 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhoundsoftware.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8V-zQ2P-Nc1i for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC5B3A13BD for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id o13so6877509qkk.9 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhoundsoftware.com; s=google; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=mqvtNMpvEYOhTvht46Bpn9DFdg5Zm0itozdJfd5kbXg=; b=heEfWW8mj4klVBhaa+2Wud2ZclEugka4nHHTCAC/JcQA0jYvSiVP/s2BqTHYAcUWA9 rRwLav6AUBkAhsjcmSC5LRQu8ulbrg+O/h7HppTUQ4x0BhNKRc3yKe23vvD9Ng5/Uomw +M0WRP9Pr9UVENrMrDHwGz6wsKPcELWQT0aV0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=mqvtNMpvEYOhTvht46Bpn9DFdg5Zm0itozdJfd5kbXg=; b=uYYzV1tvWwD/Jvj2LRv9KuuReuCz1Tl46FhFyg4eWDaU5ajGK799mKZQICSswUNhxY Z1kFoNgRCC7TY8YEVTVD5+mwLJGXdvohVWXDXDzswCyfCILrzUCHr5+3VlQ65pX9+MYE zN8avVukvizvIG1CGJsNC34QaSpykeCb7MlDjpiD0RzSvCgupzMneTD8DsrGgL4Eoy7Z wX6N2wzVmYXUMNsohu/Y3bb7zSjAlTnwpyvoIlPdnagGL0EIw8zNEOewNr7ACzenNzv4 MldHzj5J+EaAYaXKbppJeSiOhicwr3JnDqPAJQyWRFZyKspOrr5hU2uJuxEcyBXKsb/H eyIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532CFp+69NUYuAFE04/2l+BaV4FotHB/uOuyuSNqjdezbiEuOswL EjwNVRLDqmDC9XmFlThg9de7U/N8ehe0YWoH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjKVtYIb6YHh9tB5A7ByAFY2ltQGCOeVpsYJuLcWwLuHsvkTxKyQdorIkpODUXRDS3PE1XMA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:21cd:: with SMTP id h13mr6526873qka.375.1627582728633; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.16] (pool-173-73-191-214.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [173.73.191.214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bl40sm2006647qkb.64.2021.07.29.11.18.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.51.21071101
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:18:47 -0400
From: Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
To: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>, "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
CC: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>, "Cooley, Dorothy E" <decoole@nsa.gov>, Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <32A91405-D391-49A4-8BE2-BE103F8369B8@redhoundsoftware.com>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku
References: <CD589623-52EE-4958-80AB-73F0CFB3A36E@vigilsec.com> <CAErg=HF_hcXO=9=KJh5EBEov4ybS_8g4xF=cANL9+83UvP0zvQ@mail.gmail.com> <adf86f46-093f-756f-8292-9b5e088f4344@lear.ch> <CAErg=HEUFV2F8R8g8e6yCDKz_e6RebNyB5Zb2Lvgn4oc3BtE-w@mail.gmail.com> <CO6PR14MB4468A7A5EB138542CEBA5D9CEAE99@CO6PR14MB4468.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CAErg=HH4aDgju=8C7Neq_4H19EX8S2inNd9fMAMYH3h95S48Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CO6PR14MB44688BC4188063BCA54E80C4EAE99@CO6PR14MB4468.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CAErg=HGDA+16N4xhgMvuQz25DqD+_nkiFC+OuAJMkFzYYqFV0w@mail.gmail.com> <2550c1c3-1400-b380-c9ad-dad59286feee@lear.ch> <CAErg=HGnKMNNyaf-=w+DmqfXg7XYbKD2Ah-WUxf96xNN5Ecikg@mail.gmail.com> <CAErg=HFVx5JTog5_aWOrx3vAm5o=LxHfwxEqkVM8FifYCm2P+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAGgd1OdcLujCJQOaTGvS_Hkqg1=pUP-5Mu=06kqkrgFU3fVG5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAErg=HGL-s2v9=5J64GnaaFxWN4QYWMUnDRPcpC0DN5XgM1-yw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGgd1OemU0qX1Wsmx7YPMTiexKz9hmhKj3c89iT3BcrahiUP8A@mail.gmail.com> <7F1B7734-6CC2-4BDB-B4E9-67E846197387@ll.mit.edu> <CAErg=HF4aXAf8R5hqxwmrHQo=Rs2szWiueRwx+g+DK-tRwQ=iw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAErg=HF4aXAf8R5hqxwmrHQo=Rs2szWiueRwx+g+DK-tRwQ=iw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3710413127_1432647145"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/kp_jKgg-FlbiYseCEO7pWpr4p40>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Call for adoption for draft-ito-documentsigning-eku
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:18:55 -0000

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:54 AM Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <uri@ll.mit.edu> wrote:

“A bazillion of EKUs” is a much greater risk, in my opinion. Which I’d like to avoid at all costs.

 

Since the scenario here is largely hyperbolic, entirely unrealistic, and I think reflects a misunderstanding of the proposal, perhaps you can clarify:

 

Do you share the same concerns regarding certificatePolicies? 

[CW] Isn’t this apples and oranges given there is nothing like user-initial-policy-set for EKU? Maybe there should have been, but there wasn’t.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email