Re: [T2TRG] [irsg] Review of draft-irtf-t2trg-iot-edge

[Colin Perkins <[e-mail]>]

Thank you - appreciate such a rapid turn-around!
Colin


On 19 Jul 2023, at 15:49, Marie-Jose Montpetit wrote:

> I plan to be done by tomorrow.
>
> mjm
>
> Marie-José Montpetit, Ing. Ph.D.
> [e-mail]
>
>
>
> From: Colin Perkins <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> Reply: Colin Perkins <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> Date: July 19, 2023 at 10:47:10 AM
> To: Xavier De Foy <xavier.defoy=[e-mail]>
> <xavier.defoy=[e-mail]>
> Cc: Marie-Jose Montpetit <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>, Carsten
> Bormann <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, Internet Research Steering Group
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, 정하 홍 <[e-mail]> 
> <[e-mail]>,
> [e-mail] <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> Subject:  Re: [irsg] Review of draft-irtf-t2trg-iot-edge
>
> Thanks, Xavier. Look forward to Marie-Jose's comments on the changes 
> and
> the resulting submission.
>
> Cheers,
> Colin
>
>
> On 18 Jul 2023, at 16:36, Xavier De Foy wrote:
>
> Hi Marie-Jose, thank you again for your review. Sorry for the delayed
> response.
>
>
>
> We will upload a new draft revision when the I-D submission tool 
> reopens.
>
>
>
> In the meantime, here is a pdf including our responses to the 
> comments, and
> a diff showing the related updates to the text. The diff also 
> addresses you
> point about Mobile Edge X (in section 4.1).
>
>
>
> Please let us know if you have any further comments.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Xavier, on behalf of the co-authors
>
>
>
> *From:* Marie-Jose Montpetit <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 23, 2023 4:07 PM
> *To:* Xavier De Foy <[e-mail]>; Carsten Bormann <
> [e-mail]>
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Internet Research
> Steering Group <[e-mail]>; Kutscher, Dirk <[e-mail]>; 
> Eve
> Schooler <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; 정하 홍 
> <[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* RE: [irsg] Review of draft-irtf-t2trg-iot-edge
>
>
>
>
>
> It was a pleasure to do it as the topic is of great interest to me :)
>
>
>
> Marie-José Montpetit, Ing. Ph.D.
>
> [e-mail]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Xavier De Foy <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>
> Reply: Xavier De Foy <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>
> Date: May 23, 2023 at 3:51:54 PM
> To: Marie-Jose Montpetit <[e-mail]> 
> <[e-mail]>,
> Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>, Internet Research Steering Group <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>, Kutscher, Dirk <[e-mail]> 
> <[e-mail]>,
> Eve Schooler <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>,
> [e-mail] <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, 정하 홍 
> <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>
> Subject:  RE: [irsg] Review of draft-irtf-t2trg-iot-edge
>
>
>
> Hi Marie-José,
>
>
>
>   Thank you for sharing this thorough review, we (co-authors) will 
> prepare
> an update to address your comments and will get back to you. And we 
> will
> also take your comment on Mobile Edge X into account.
>
>
>
>   Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Xavier.
>
>
>
> *From:* Marie-Jose Montpetit <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 23, 2023 3:44 PM
> *To:* Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Internet Research
> Steering Group <[e-mail]>; Kutscher, Dirk <[e-mail]>; 
> Eve
> Schooler <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; 정하 홍 
> <[e-mail]>;
> Xavier De Foy <[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* Re: [irsg] Review of draft-irtf-t2trg-iot-edge
>
>
>
>
>
> I just realized that Mobile EdgeX that is mentioned in the draft was
> acquired by Google. So should be updated.
>
>
>
> mjm
>
>
>
> Marie-José Montpetit, Ing. Ph.D.
>
> [e-mail]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> Reply: Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> Date: May 22, 2023 at 3:16:30 AM
> To: Marie-Jose Montpetit <[e-mail]> 
> <[e-mail]>
> Cc: 정하 홍 <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, 
> [e-mail]
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, Xavier De Foy
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>,
> [e-mail] <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, Eve 
> Schooler
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, Dirk Kutscher
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, Internet Research Steering 
> Group
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>
> Subject:  Re: [irsg] Review of draft-irtf-t2trg-iot-edge
>
>
>
> Hi Marie-José,
>
> On 2023-05-19, at 18:41, Marie-Jose Montpetit <[e-mail]> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for the delay. Thanks for your efforts on this as IoT edge is 
>> very
> current. I commented directly on the pdf - attached.
>
> Thank you for the detailed review, which I still have to digest (just
> returned from vacation).
>
>> My overall evaluation is that while everything in the draft is valid 
>> the
> document needs a little bit of updating. IoT is exploding and some of 
> the
> use cases have evolved since you started the draft. And AIoT/AI is now 
> a
> main driver. Finally, while digital twinning is briefly mentioned it 
> should
> be expanded is now also inherently part of the IoT edge.
>
> <hats off>
>
> I agree that both AI and DT should be mentioned, but I think these 
> very
> dynamic fields would also make great subjects for more detailed 
> follow-on
> documents to this more general overview.
> So I wouldn’t recommend delaying the overview while we collect 
> substantial
> new information about them.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> [image: Banner]
>
> [image: Banner]
> <https://www.interdigital.com/white_papers/state-of-5g-report-enabling-the-boundless-generation?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=banner&utm_id=5g&utm_term=5g>
>
> State of 5G Report: Enabling The Boundless Generation
> <https://www.interdigital.com/white_papers/state-of-5g-report-enabling-the-boundless-generation?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=banner&utm_id=5g&utm_term=5g>
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity 
> to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone 
> other
> than its intended recipient. Unintended transmission shall not 
> constitute
> waiver of any privilege or confidentiality obligation. If you received 
> this
> communication in error, please do not review, copy or distribute it, 
> notify
> me immediately by email, and delete the original message and any
> attachments. Unless expressly stated in this e-mail, nothing in this
> message or any attachment should be construed as a digital or 
> electronic
> signature.