IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 07 April 2022 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B9A3A15B4; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jJzYLZjFgVpF; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C447A3A15C4; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with ESMTP id 237J32FV031928; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:52:54 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=D+oXyUaRTAYphFzZ6cXhvGadSo7iBNxnQamlLBBaMl0=; b=T8MkfHOtZHMcovBR+Fh7pV5uZqzZ6zUSxM6ozZb9it1LqjeR+ql4sT300tzAtzuOJ8rN azBkUc5fhF/xgjeImu2dFL3pcj5ar3yjW4mEYCiNzqs1HwlgLsCb02+l5HCBz9OrobD9 G+9gjAw1jsAwLfN+zS6wXWhajHL8euwC18XMeuEo5+eWHgMLnDwIloHbSxH9PJTjLCD+ UjGANa3w4FO65vCoGfSzZZwSd/o+bkeHpK0vhJNgLodJR+qc7yLhaNMQB6l2y0ItyPT3 1I3fMvM9EwVu4MZvpwh6u/w3t713YP/nQgZTePwScBGa3EpaMKrlbtqNp1e+IBizip5c UQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3f9qmknp01-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:52:54 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 237JZaEB012248; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:52:53 -0700
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.24]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3f7kmjpnm6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 Apr 2022 12:52:53 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag4mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.986.22; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 15:52:52 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.32; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 15:52:52 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.033; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 15:52:52 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "tao-discuss@ietf.org" <tao-discuss@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net>
Thread-Topic: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF
Thread-Index: AQHYSo5NLFc3l2diPkS/dmSAKyaCaKzk0tGA///QyoCAAFUaAP//5E6A
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 19:52:52 +0000
Message-ID: <D91F9FE6-4641-4C7D-92A7-CE6F57AD00FC@akamai.com>
References: <905c834c-30d7-ede7-6ea1-a5b200a249d7@nielstenoever.net> <0192FFCD-2410-415B-90B2-248F2823CC97@eggert.org> <D6FFB194-FBC9-4AC1-B29F-B00A9A3C2E3E@akamai.com> <C41F2B92-1216-4A2F-99D8-611D0457AE97@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <C41F2B92-1216-4A2F-99D8-611D0457AE97@eggert.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.59.22031300
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <758B562FC5036348B7DA23155BE56485@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.858 definitions=2022-04-07_04:2022-04-07, 2022-04-07 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=838 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204070097
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 64WVFNtXBqri7X1yXp1cV1h8DnbcgIgL
X-Proofpoint-GUID: 64WVFNtXBqri7X1yXp1cV1h8DnbcgIgL
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-04-07_04,2022-04-07_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=806 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204070098
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/MfyZzYGGk5BxYsGwYEoKo4pDZzc>
Subject: Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 19:53:16 -0000

>   I would ask though that going forward, we find a way for the IESG to review just the changes to the Tao again - that is how we usually evaluate "bis" documents. ADs don't have much time, and reviewing a diff is much faster than reviewing an entire document.

FWIW, I recommend that going forward, the IESG doesn't review this document, as it doesn't officially review the rest of the website either.
Maybe it should be an EMODIR document.

Ah well, I'll have a 6722-bis to bring to DISPATCH for IETF 114.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email