IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 21 April 2022 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149B83A040B; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LiV5mCL0E_Qd; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2FE73A043C; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 23LE5QPh032651; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 17:56:08 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=G8AqEpGAYUNKhi0u2mFaqZAxAAHZGCH32EJSbPZgg2c=; b=JANELCJI6XHyKgseu7idSq9/MskpB10wy86xpUrtQ+iOUeFVgo9lNNYEH7z/KCZBOvn+ brNlr2OxD7bJcLMSu6s3MxUknHItFKgTDe8LfFy/umpmih8DG+n9vmkxXBwplIdDZAur 2xrcQlKRYpAiCkAzUsZKRY7DXAXrxG+ZY9qYxF5crUmi0eTtSyT9sknJmVKiJha1cydj i2HwDsr3l7hY7J/qNXtsxBZipZhV3CNmI0dppDecmAQUfWRNxBOUmH3CAMVyqHQTiaRB YrCCGEV19MgqH09wOL0zM/xa7gJJIvlUAcyWpw3IttGL4BxeMXJdHZ8mix6Jesm7J9D3 rg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3fjkxa3p9h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 17:56:08 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 23LGu7sM007664; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 12:56:07 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3ffs4y9utp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 12:56:07 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.986.22; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 12:56:02 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.32; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 12:56:02 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.033; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 12:56:02 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
CC: Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "tao-discuss@ietf.org" <tao-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF)
Thread-Index: AQHYVSt5QhfiYv045UGIfwndUf/zbaz6lwMA
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:56:01 +0000
Message-ID: <15D1105A-39B1-4DD7-BBFB-94C2389FA8FB@akamai.com>
References: <905c834c-30d7-ede7-6ea1-a5b200a249d7@nielstenoever.net> <0192FFCD-2410-415B-90B2-248F2823CC97@eggert.org> <D6FFB194-FBC9-4AC1-B29F-B00A9A3C2E3E@akamai.com> <C41F2B92-1216-4A2F-99D8-611D0457AE97@eggert.org> <D91F9FE6-4641-4C7D-92A7-CE6F57AD00FC@akamai.com> <fb4d1b71-a13c-b98d-be48-cd2d4007a909@gmail.com> <3cd4806d-cbf9-e78d-4709-d9fb98ce1ed2@gmail.com> <5097E7DA-82F7-4DCA-B24A-9815625E417E@eggert.org> <817a03aa-aea7-3bea-3abe-7840d10de444@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <817a03aa-aea7-3bea-3abe-7840d10de444@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.60.22041000
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0FFFF0DA7D129C48B2E0A517813823D2@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.486, 18.0.858 definitions=2022-04-21_03:2022-04-21, 2022-04-21 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=674 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204210089
X-Proofpoint-GUID: adlX4dWiUFzvh0o5YdQYGco5j7rNZASh
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: adlX4dWiUFzvh0o5YdQYGco5j7rNZASh
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-04-21_02,2022-04-21_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=643 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204210088
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/tgt-BMHWkeWTONWqt217b7aUq6g>
Subject: Re: [tao-discuss] Revising RFC6722? (was Re: Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF)
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:56:29 -0000

> I don't at all think we should take the responsibility for the web site content away from the LLC + EMO + IESG, but just have a principle that non-trivial changes should be given some sort of community review.

Correction of facts: EMO has no responsibility for website content. Some may be confused because Greg is full-time staff and also an EMODIR chair.  The IESG currently has, by informational RFC, oversite of one page.

Expression of opinion: It would make sense to have an email address (or even a mailing list,  like ietf-website-discuss) to report issues or concerns, but subjecting www.ietf.org to some sort of community review (especially *prior review*) is a bad idea. Recall how the IETF nearly ripped itself apart over inclusive language.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email