Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 07 April 2022 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514E23A0B28; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MgnPEAGNAKcP; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D7773A0AAE; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:28ff:791:c421:2ceb]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D58351D328E; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:16:21 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1649344581; bh=AlOTgF+3cUsnwfQhbSKPhy4wI6WwQ78ewvgtIs2SJ60=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=wWZ+esQoJnUaObSYNeQpvLWY93WTM2kGbW8H2W+KUpd5PnKvrFs1hWC2G1+5/Om/B wZ8zgWqOWAIOL0qfSgCPGQxH18px35o5KSaQgTz8XXTAZ6k2CuGVV/HCgMQLGGbiOA rqgzCtxsHnJ2zKc1RpfSF8H2ADpi+cJreLXdF6T0=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5771BEDB-BCDF-41B6-9460-4148207B2754"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <905c834c-30d7-ede7-6ea1-a5b200a249d7@nielstenoever.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 18:16:21 +0300
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tao-discuss@ietf.org
Message-Id: <0192FFCD-2410-415B-90B2-248F2823CC97@eggert.org>
References: <905c834c-30d7-ede7-6ea1-a5b200a249d7@nielstenoever.net>
To: Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net>
X-MailScanner-ID: D58351D328E.A42A8
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/ktn-kzugsA8ru-FsnqW0imvC5e4>
Subject: Re: [tao-discuss] Review Request for Possible Revision of the Tao of the IETF
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 15:16:37 -0000

Hi,

On 2022-4-7, at 17:46, Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net> wrote:
> As the editor of the Tao of the IETF I would like to, as per RFC 6722, request your review for a possible new revision of the Tao.
> 
> You can find the Possible New Revision of the Tao here: http://www.ietf.org/tao-possible-revision.html and here: https://github.com/ietf/tao/blob/main/Tao.md

is there a way to view a diff between the proposed and current versions?

Thanks,
Lars