Re: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Fri, 28 August 2020 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10643A1594; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fI32Rp2fGwcH; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED5323A0D23; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.71]) by opfednr21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4Bd8TS29gjz60Q2; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:15:08 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1598595308; bh=n42HJIsT+4Q2cq1753uwNTnicOQick+HveiPNXPZo/k=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=FJ7hxc8KG0Fz2eMh168gKOrU8xHpKgUxTATJrsOtGqLYC0TGDz05BBmVk9f9Nq1lK r6Ya5TKb2lcwbLfzhKDWIR5sH1hNq1D0L3JkAfGY12Tb4DaYUHfPuZOEvOvdoxttFg 0O7AL0ISAehIP8AHqbCgg6hbtoeAv4dzY9cIoflGFHvLLIYjUtlcFXdCvE48iV/2Pl 05PfjL2hTGn27SLvi+QrRQPyZ9whcos3z4DZw5+of62/Ak+r098Bqc2dUaWHJOhrnO 6a/ChlOY625FI+Q5djSXp/oFmmv1otB3/hqlqyzFxJpk7DAAZ9aNBwZyI+T06LY8j/ FHowCqfRrl+2Q==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.20]) by opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4Bd8TS1QYLzFpWX; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:15:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition
Thread-Index: AQHWfIT4DeeaPGA0H0a0CmDVOkAgWalNC47w
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 06:15:07 +0000
Message-ID: <25195_1598595308_5F48A0EC_25195_489_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330315264DB@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <CA+YzgTvnv5nUZ6OYx9GkFUxDHxAFNvYsx5LrFfho3860_MLfZA@mail.gmail.com> <29904_1598531216_5F47A690_29904_16_1_7263a5d8-b9e0-4e33-9ea1-9cbab9ff0f0b@OPEXCAUBM7F.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <2e8a3df4-9c7e-d4ab-1ac7-b539ad74fbae@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e8a3df4-9c7e-d4ab-1ac7-b539ad74fbae@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/5ajLwxc0ARPee4-268Yi6mQr1Q4>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 06:15:12 -0000

Hi Joel, 

> Looking at it, building from it, and where agreed copying the text
> would seem sensible.

Yes, that is what I had in mind.  

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Joel M. Halpern [mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 27 août 2020 17:16
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; Vishnu
> Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
> Cc : TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
> Objet : Re: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-
> definition
> 
> RFC 7297 is an Independent Submission Informational RFC.
> Looking at it, building from it, and where agreed copying the text
> would seem sensible.
> Referencing it normatively would be a major problem, as it is not an
> IETF consensus document.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 8/27/2020 8:26 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I support this effort.
> >
> > That’s said, I do think the document should leverage existing
> > documents, e.g., use https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297 to define
> the SLOs:
> >
> > 3  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3>.  Connectivity
> > Provisioning Profile (CPP) . . . . . . . . . . . 9
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-9>
> >
> > 3.1  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.1>.  Customer
> > Nodes Map  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-9>
> >
> > 3.2  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.2>.  Scope . . .
> .
> > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-10>
> >
> > 3.3  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.3>.  QoS
> > Guarantees  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-11>
> >
> > 3.4  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-
> 3.4>.  Availability
> > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-11>
> >
> > 3.5  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.5>.  Capacity  .
> .
> > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-12>
> >
> > 3.6  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.6>.  Conformance
> > Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-13>
> >
> > 3.7  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.7>.  Overall
> > Traffic Guarantees  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-13>
> >
> > 3.8  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.8>.  Traffic
> > Isolation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-13>
> >
> > 3.9  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.9>.  Flow
> > Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-13>
> >
> > 3.10  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.10>. Routing
> and
> > Forwarding  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-14>
> >
> > 3.11  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.11>. Activation
> > Means  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-15>
> >
> > 3.12  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.12>. Invocation
> > Means  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-15>
> >
> >       3.13  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#section-3.13>.
> > Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
> > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7297#page-16>
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Med
> >
> > *De :*Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] *De la part de* Vishnu
> Pavan
> > Beeram *Envoyé :* mercredi 19 août 2020 17:50 *À :* TEAS WG
> > <teas@ietf.org> *Cc :* TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
> *Objet :*
> > [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition
> >
> > All,
> >
> > This is start of a *three* week poll on making
> > draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition-03 a TEAS working group
> document.
> > Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> > support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
> > document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
> like
> > to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> >
> > The poll ends September 9th (extra week to account for vacation
> season).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Pavan and Lou
> >


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.