IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 03 May 2021 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A542D3A1B39 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 09:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P9ssktYTbSQ7 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 09:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F3703A1B33 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 09:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1774; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1620059401; x=1621269001; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=CHl6rhab7FSujOwkaNBfe39bYb40mtdEtjwHKfF35l0=; b=Mvk8G19c0EFmjgi0ZYLbPZGBm1GgwGJBZVvnLgb30nzlUBCG5nmm7Eci kCTViJvRU6OBZ+vg3+EX3SqvNfkxxITTztwWsdOd7QiBb00cwb6CXohZS lvhKAUAzyo5aqbVs3tREmOiHjrEvwpHIQyG3rJO/crrav7l0b+hi5c8lR U=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: A0BBAADsI5Bg/xbLJq1aGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQGCF4MiVgEnEjGERIkEiEklA5x7BAcBAQEKAwEBHQsMBAEBhAxEAoF8JjgTAgQBAQEDAgMBAQEBAQUBAQECAQYEcROFUA2GRAEBAQMBAQEhSwsFCwsMDCoCAicWGgYTgnEBgmYhD6gQeoEygQGEYYUACgaBOgGBUogVg3hDgguBFScMEIJfPoEEgVwBAQKEdTaCKwSDLkMQW3ERDCkZnkKdGIMag0WBSZggBSKlIrUIAYQGAgQGBQIWgWsjgVkzGggbFTsqAYI+PhIZDo42iG2FSz8DLwI2AgYBCQEBAwmKSy2CFwEB
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:M4YEQK3tMhAWstYh6DgcRQqjBDAkLtp033Aq2lEZdDV+eKWj5q OTtd4c0gL5jytUZWE4lbm7VJWobHvA+fdOgLU5EqylWGDd0leADIYn1of6xi2lJiuWzI5g/I NtabJ3BtG1LVUSt6vHyS25F9pl/9Wd6qCvgo7loEtFdg1hZ6F+4woRMG/yeXFefwVICYE0E5 CR/KN81l+dUE4KZce2DGRtZYb+juDM/aiWAyIuNloC4AmKgSjA0s+fLzGomjEDTjhI3bAutU /CngCR3NTEj9iLjjnBymTU85Na3OHE9+IGLsmNhs8JQw+c7TqVWA==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,270,1613433600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="33254548"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 May 2021 16:29:59 +0000
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([10.61.144.35]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 143GTwmm023661 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 May 2021 16:29:59 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <42D537D1-7694-492C-848A-045F2CF447AA@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2DBE228A-3533-450D-BD85-0594BF1AC52D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 18:29:58 +0200
In-Reply-To: <FC5AD0C4-C4DF-4D9F-BBFF-BCA574C0D6C2@akamai.com>
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, "terminology@ietf.org" <terminology@ietf.org>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <0D099A46-15A9-4427-A587-262897D9A722@eggert.org> <7E1939F9-57F3-4702-ADDE-EB4982A396A8@akamai.com> <17EAAD0D-7CE1-4756-AABC-F48728152B70@eggert.org> <FC5AD0C4-C4DF-4D9F-BBFF-BCA574C0D6C2@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.144.35, [10.61.144.35]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/GwRjp4qty-FUk4VpI_F0Z_G-8Jo>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 16:30:07 -0000

That’s a very good question.  I could think of several places LATE in the process, like shepherd review forms, but perhaps this is something also for the tao?

This falls in a class of other checks that should happen “as you go”, like YANG validation, security considerations, etc.  Draft hygiene? ;-)

Eliot

> On 3 May 2021, at 18:15, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>>  I don't expect disagreement. But I'd be happy to report to this list and/or forward the relevant messages.
> 
> I don't either.  But if the IESG is going to recommend the NIST doc as guidance to contributors, *where* does that happen?
> 
> --
> Terminology mailing list
> Terminology@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email