Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 05 May 2021 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4EF3A1263 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2021 23:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fUz_B1SKsed3 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 May 2021 23:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74BD3A1261 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2021 23:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:54ca:2d0:fd87:7c95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D245600352; Wed, 5 May 2021 09:58:26 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1620197906; bh=84svSl+hiGZwA4KsNjTyxHewv/PF2PnbiYyFFP0YgE8=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=vHXDs++wSt3bTv9qxDlwfnptQCaWJTXJLdWV2cOQRNHj1oR0ou3DhIPARhCWGZM+T WW5jKLnRYBBcZBQuQw+B5cQZmp3mDCbnBPgTxmXyfCCKGkxr411tgEGSdHTxVB6QZo 5O8k0PQtsT/tm3lEE4ysPUtxZA0Ce3qe/cLuALt8=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <2C970E30-8DB7-4FA7-AB04-F00EE03766D8@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_53E3F00E-ABCF-477D-8C88-8C4DDE3A7703"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 09:58:25 +0300
In-Reply-To: <5D6D75AB-1E9E-4CB3-A86B-6D8EAA37BB14@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: Dan York <york@isoc.org>, terminology@ietf.org
To: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <2C2B2441-DFE2-4C9F-AC21-48B6A8736329@isoc.org> <5D6D75AB-1E9E-4CB3-A86B-6D8EAA37BB14@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
X-MailScanner-ID: 5D245600352.A0450
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/i6Ok73a4QSwvLzS_79TBWvAHn3c>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 06:58:39 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-5-5, at 6:13, Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> How can one formally abandon a working group that was never formally adopted in the first place? other than by closing this mailing list?

I believe what was meant is that we abandon the chartering effort via the datatracker.

Thanks,
Lars