IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 04 May 2021 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0BA3A202D for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=UqEUtbH4; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Ycx19w5g
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDOJL0_Pk8Cl for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D563F3A1F87 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 29914 invoked from network); 4 May 2021 02:39:25 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=74d5.6090b3dd.k2105; bh=sKnbrAGedD3u2mfUphnWAxExlDgyptLB651umQ3f7bU=; b=UqEUtbH45POtd0GPwaI7oynSrh0uKxrq1q2Q7I2rCQzIYQbcq6pM40K+wy01z88K/ngY8Yt8d1EPbyM07+sl+yb6GjKL21NzSURKyblSN5zLixmBcfvj5QbBwo1xp3X84ToH7F5/NPdGJgHl40cUwf23e5ipefwAkuYq/SRABBWUAHXCdnPvNU+jQwyi5F+HpUWFEXtAp+8msECojDXWEa95OqqmPUxujAr0t7UZihT2wwGcJmFRq7yxdN+4oobyrJ/SFTQ30MJZ5ZLlTvi9C1vp7DwXmCwU0+YLXeP27Arr1hE6AE5/DPhB6DyelYA4B6s91KWpZX+RiN/7zJuIPA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=74d5.6090b3dd.k2105; bh=sKnbrAGedD3u2mfUphnWAxExlDgyptLB651umQ3f7bU=; b=Ycx19w5gSwqS6sTsSn9XeAcrsGUpaxd8M56xGPZ6+WghAHXn77rj3LpHCoDA1kEQDDP6RvKXLQw+TWWJVC+J+HPrSKo/Ns8R9QSwjVV74zr5QpbUq01sxd0zyc5AelQgIZe8qTDlaojr3z3to18CHIBLtZM1zztB8vSSv94csx9TpA6AyL5e83eHqSVLUyPaCzpIpkbvq21wcLUqhvdh4O42DUG5Be4xcGbCe4FsZHL/z198NGzrPMoFQCyPpHjCAKwSPe1em+pbj7pKEQdU144Z74LrGHEEihQOmngQGkLzGf9IL5LLiWaCCP/mL6OWKJIL7hc7MVxczoWq5p9B1w==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 04 May 2021 02:39:25 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id E8E2D6F3344; Mon, 3 May 2021 22:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 22:39:23 -0400
Message-Id: <20210504023924.E8E2D6F3344@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: terminology@ietf.org
Cc: lear@cisco.com
In-Reply-To: <42D537D1-7694-492C-848A-045F2CF447AA@cisco.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/yWAZv2VXT_Yd2y0ljqWDBDdq4M8>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 02:39:35 -0000

It appears that Eliot Lear  <lear@cisco.com> said:
>That’s a very good question.  I could think of several places LATE in the process, like shepherd review forms,
>but perhaps this is something also for the tao?

I was planning to put it in the RFC style guide but a reference in the Tao sounds
like a good idea, too.

>This falls in a class of other checks that should happen “as you go”, like YANG validation, security
>considerations, etc.  Draft hygiene? ;-)

Definitely "as you go" since I don't want people to perceive our editors
as the Language Police, which they are not.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email