Re: [Tools-discuss] .txt? [I-D Action: draft-xxx.txt]

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 30 June 2021 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA713A1BBF for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 06:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KS4xQp8Q9_l6 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 05:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5C053A1BC2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 05:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GFLzG3KKFz2xJ3; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:59:54 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <8611d10a-690c-a890-e741-05a505920948@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:59:54 +0200
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 646750793.6872441-a36166609e99c1f4edaf35d4cada1bd9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DD43BA34-BEA5-4278-958A-013B75183EC5@tzi.org>
References: <20210627013258.1D30F188447C@ary.qy> <691b91b6-86d7-2a3d-b9dc-8c19cc507db4@gmail.com> <584d34d6-5630-bbb7-35cc-9459dabc80f0@taugh.com> <82887902-90d0-3616-656b-fc39e4febd47@gmail.com> <70fee53d-28b9-874a-6988-6c1234ca149@taugh.com> <20210628193815.GL5057@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <ffd86c27-82a0-8c92-d270-ab1c770acb99@gmail.com> <20210628234707.GM5057@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b2b1a003-317b-c099-8dbc-da37738203a9@gmx.de> <20210629214106.GT5057@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <9000db84-7e97-fc65-03c8-e7af6d2dd71c@gmx.de> <B1047490-9D01-40F4-B1C7-BA3CF5B8CCA2@tzi.org> <e0be6976-8a2f-69eb-38e4-150d8f37f087@gmx.de> <8611d10a-690c-a890-e741-05a505920948@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/nw6BmZ1sWr4wGuAxDXRC08Jy6kE>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] .txt? [I-D Action: draft-xxx.txt]
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:00:03 -0000

On 2021-06-30, at 14:54, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Am 30.06.2021 um 07:46 schrieb Julian Reschke:
>> Am 30.06.2021 um 07:38 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
>>> On 30. Jun 2021, at 07:37, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> content model for lists
>>> 
>>> Got a reference?
>>> 
>>> Grüße, Carsten
>> 
>> It's about making <t> inside <li> mandatory, even for single paragraph
>> list items; should be mentioned either in
>> <https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis> or in the "RFC
>> XML and Style Guide Change Management Team" meeting notes (will try to
>> find it later).
> 
> Found it:

Thanks.  I had already forgotten the issue because:

> <https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis/issues/46>,

Closed (WONTFIX, but not explicitly labeled as such)

> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/xml2rfc/ticket/633>, and

I see nothing wrong with the preptool using only a subset of the syntax.
(I also don’t know why it would help, though, and why it wouldn’t be done for other instances of mixed content.)

> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation-notes-12.html#name-mixed-content-model>.

“Resolution: Rejected.¶”

I thought we were in all-clear state about the risk of this becoming part of v3.

Grüße, Carsten


> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> This list is for discussion, not for action requests or bug reports.
> * Report datatracker and mailarchive bugs to: datatracker-project@ietf.org
> * Report tools.ietf.org bugs to: webmaster@tools.ietf.org
> * Report all other bugs or issues to: ietf-action@ietf.org
> List info (including how to Unsubscribe): https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss