IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] AWS ipv6-only features

Clark Gaylord <cgaylord@vt.edu> Thu, 25 November 2021 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <cgaylord@vt.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A4A3A07BF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:42:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vt-edu.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K7q-BIT4gmml for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:42:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B3E3A07B4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id 207so14593191ljf.10 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:42:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vt-edu.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fiDBfmOQnoMIi7tg1J/WZOXnRl+ceV78NM4z0N3CRi8=; b=5jwZQKUKjlfyzko0IVneXmCPCpOJADfKFEXbb8eYGSnrWlBPbEdqBChpDD9M+SHDIy ZXvxYg7YEJCYFvAYAcWIiQM7Mz3yQG/ilE3qdjlevMHJ34IrpE5MQWEnXYbanN4y25TW m9vPiJZUNlnt6US1HeW0pLyXS0glM3E+DKCkd5P2XQDAMztN8x2ptc/cVj23KHFcqQLh dMClyhSLA7lV5pB0/GmwYKvyiFe2oLHjj+7YSVTfKCBCNdsLFyC2REXWq08PYsIw6Meg 9yBrEOHB/p7vdXvDfHyuQA2fFwVhIzeqRezaSTqAiZsS0fLU5Zjh3ntwErHA2raBRozF MuLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fiDBfmOQnoMIi7tg1J/WZOXnRl+ceV78NM4z0N3CRi8=; b=QI66lM+OX5l28IpVGROj0R50KEWEfqZGwleq07t07XVSvUqyPSQrxzompFALx9D4cX zx0cQAxrmj9UE/OaOnKLnJvKME8IMVVAKQacfEuBcfIGjQccZC89yOWaQBDu7LGhXfXY scWeCtMuhLqz+oXmr1ZzCthiA9AK3AiUwS0xP6vK7Pd/rFMSRwb1lu/YJ4nocJQfv9SJ RV781plH8ZTufnSMWxVoV+5wg6tfpxa++ysr5GnuC87KfY51y55dXkaaZM+Ec67+9wOk eRE44t325+AYRPjyMMeLMzARrGdqoDjCBMGZhfH/2VzAGCVEsbLTz/DQu+poDKOFaR19 +7EA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bWdYONxNRDcriVRGeb33xeo0lpHfacNFdLTrACFdCq9PfJNJ+ eJrIyvOP3ACukJP4FpjbP8zrxGENoHjfFvZizG9RbHoAqLY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySUBQ5TvUxkfbR5g5zMC0dNIZCWAguXpfatVLIhbP1wNPInC9LoWMYYIZ8N71X4Po4SKsctBtvPxEcMoxvI7A=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a26a:: with SMTP id k10mr27293617ljm.156.1637872917076; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:41:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD6AjGRAkpMDaAh31mVL=+Gcz5PHejUxxLazr4Xb=vVRHfaSpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2z8u_DQMd9eNSQp_RhBinXk2KyH4pdbVLMEqOta-hoG1w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2z8u_DQMd9eNSQp_RhBinXk2KyH4pdbVLMEqOta-hoG1w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Clark Gaylord <cgaylord@vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:41:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CADzU5g5odQ82FJ0TsdNxFB42OkgLZ+PWanLLrK1roLojAUS54A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000068f19c05d1a301e7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/0vs6voELcCpaxxsIUtXbKXvZNsw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] AWS ipv6-only features
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:42:06 -0000

Yeah AWS hold their cards close and don't seem to engage the community, but
they do have decent IPv6 coverage across the services. Notwithstanding that
the whole VPC concept has the whiff of ancient days about it; tonight we're
gonna network like it's 1999!

EC2 as part of the address is a great idea. I am so stealing that (can't
believe I haven't thought of it.)


On Thu, Nov 25, 2021, 15:09 Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021, 23:51 Ca By, <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Fyi, aws has gone beyond perfunctory ipv6 support and has released a
>> series of enhancements, with a focus on ipv6-only scenarios, including
>> nat64 / dns64
>>
>>
>> https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2021/11/aws-nat64-dns64-communication-ipv6-ipv4-services/
>>
>> AWS has lapped Google and Azure in advanced network features, which is
>> really surprising given the early muscle Google developed at IPv6 launch
>> and a stronger need to differentiate …
>>
>
> AWS failed to do ULAs properly. 'ec2' could be a random global ID, but
> unlikely when their service is "EC2".
>
> Matters more here because they're exposing that to all of their tenants. I
> think GUAs would have been better for these internal all tenant services.
>
> I've never seen AWS participate here in 20 years, unlike G and M.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email