IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] Apr 23: webex group experiment

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 17 April 2009 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1BA3A696A for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rWs5IcrprkMX for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (mail.mipassoc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEC83A683F for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (adsl-68-122-42-208.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.42.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3HMSrFS031653 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:28:59 -0700
Message-ID: <49E902A4.4050104@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:28:52 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>
References: <49DE44DD.4060202@dcrocker.net> <07EE8ACCA37D408E91855E85FD491396@GIH.CO.UK>
In-Reply-To: <07EE8ACCA37D408E91855E85FD491396@GIH.CO.UK>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: vMeet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Apr 23: webex group experiment
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vmeet>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:27:51 -0000

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
> I realised we're all using this message's subject line, whilst Friday 
> will be the 24th of April.

That's why I had to quickly sent out:

Subject: Oops -- Re: [vmeet] Apr 23^H^H24  webex group experiment
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:09:19 -0400
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
CC: vMeet@ietf.org
...
Very sorry.  I did mean Friday and therefore meant *24* April (not 23).


> Also - time-wise, we're also going to have to tighten this:
> 
> Dave writes:
> 
>> We're going to conduct a real-world experiment, using webex, on 
>> Friday, 23 April, at 7am, Pacific Daylight Time.
>>
>> It will be for 2 hours, with a real agenda, and attempting to get real 
>> work done.
>>
>> Time conversions:
>>
>>     7apm    PDT
>>
>>    10am     EDT
>>
>>     2pm     UTC
>>
>>     3pm     Amsterdam
> 
> Nope. :-)  Europe's now on Summer Time. You are quoting CET which only 
> works in the winter.
> London's at BST = UTC+1
> Amsterdam, Paris, Frankfurt, etc. are on CEST = UTC+2

The US Pacific time is the anchor.  That means that the other US times are 
correct and I believe the UTC is correct also.  And it's why I cited UTC rather 
than UK, GB or somesuch.  However I wasn't sure about daylight savings for 
Europe. Thanks for catching this.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status