IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] Apr 23: webex group experiment

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 17 April 2009 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1DA3A6FC3 for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.161, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XBrTRInpVKZ9 for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5733A6E35 for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F4E9A4786; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:14:25 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EnmOflugYiSk; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:14:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from THINKPADR52.vigilsec.com (pool-71-191-197-15.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.191.197.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140869A4781; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:14:23 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:12:21 -0400
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <49E89CB3.5020103@acm.org>
References: <49DE44DD.4060202@dcrocker.net> <200904162018.n3GKISLs012182@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <E62C6CCD-5C78-4254-9FF8-988AEC3B52CE@gmail.com> <49E7E2E8.4060700@gmail.com> <20090417145715.1BF3E9A47CB@odin.smetech.net> <49E89CB3.5020103@acm.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <20090417181423.140869A4781@odin.smetech.net>
Cc: vMeet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vmeet] Apr 23: webex group experiment
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vmeet>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:13:15 -0000

Marc:

> > Cisco has donated WebEx to the IETF.  The only cost to a participant
> > should be associated with dial-in phone charges if the participant
> > cannot use VoIP or Skype or the US/Canada 1-800 number.
>
>If Webex is already the conference tool of the IETF, what is the
>purpose of this mailing-list?

Cisco has made this offer.  I expect it will be used.  Maybe there 
are better (with many potential criteria) alternatives.  If so, I 
hope this group identifies them.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email