IETF Logo Mail Archive

[vmeet] TOOL: webex group experiment

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 17 April 2009 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD5F3A6826 for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2NC9vcpCm-On for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (mail.mipassoc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FEC28C153 for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (adsl-68-122-42-208.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.42.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3HGGwgr015207 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:17:04 -0700
Message-ID: <49E8AB7A.7070708@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:16:58 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vMeet@ietf.org
References: <49DE44DD.4060202@dcrocker.net> <200904162018.n3GKISLs012182@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <E62C6CCD-5C78-4254-9FF8-988AEC3B52CE@gmail.com> <49E7E2E8.4060700@gmail.com> <20090417145715.1BF3E9A47CB@odin.smetech.net> <49E89CB3.5020103@acm.org> <49E89F0F.4010202@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <49E89F0F.4010202@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [vmeet] TOOL: webex group experiment
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vmeet>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:16:08 -0000

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> As far as I can see, the phrase "Cisco has donated WebEx to the IETF"
> (so that IETF participants can use it free of charge) does not imply
> that "WebEx is already the conference tool of the IETF".

+1


1. A limited set of IETF folks have experience with it.  IMO, we need broader 
exposure of a tool before deciding on its use.  The session a week from today is 
intended to help that.

2. It is not clear whether it can or cannot satisfy the IETF's functional 
requirements, since we haven't said what they are yet.

3. We haven't compared it against other choices.  (I could be wrong, but my 
impression is that the donation is not unbounded in time and scale.  I thought 
it was for an evaluation period, but I might have misunderstood.)

4. "Free" isn't good enough if the use of the capability falls short.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status