Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is not archival
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 17 September 2021 13:28 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DF73A1970; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.281
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1DraaDsOxpGi; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356C03A195D; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.34.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 18HDScVc037254 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:28:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1631885319; bh=1WRCASPiqRkMQVH5EppAZLExNRA7OsefRzK1hjVNKHU=; h=To:Cc:References:Reply-To:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To; b=nu8WtQHGq/C+h/zlKIqFdPTYmD5FkreIWRkXsvpQqlYaV5wCkEbv3nxmD9/Z/8bG7 MIR7Z/OXMfXvzyM+aihrjsHKUWbKaB3+EwNuEDE+fSgzRAoKcduZTHx72ajMrPquou S+TbqBwq0YYlnYXDfkKW5kr6uzy7Dm+u/UhaJFJw=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.34.206] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
References: <f2ea0c4f-9500-391d-b8d1-dcc3ac4a7b1c@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBOeKxO6KOWyC8WBqUxYyqAwqYdKOesBN+2nxtWAy17Mbg@mail.gmail.com> <ADDEE9BD-790B-4E44-982B-DAA15F50722A@tzi.org> <2B11D777-9D50-490F-B7C6-9DD769C789A6@mnot.net> <B6A2905B-6EB9-4A22-AD1A-10C4910408A2@tzi.org> <1534366.1631820151@dooku> <f3177492-7ea9-1a20-11bd-0387e6e80ecd@huitema.net> <1536418.1631821801@dooku> <f3417961-83d4-5ca7-6f69-d8073f179db8@joelhalpern.com> <5AFDEC57-64C2-4D96-BCD6-DF8A89F4A1FF@tzi.org> <22E5DDB0-7AE7-43F1-8BE6-F8141CFBC88B@mnot.net> <AB2FD684-4217-44B4-BBBC-BEADA7DB38F7@tzi.org>
Reply-To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is not archival
Message-ID: <0ef0933a-72c3-b335-72bb-858ef6868784@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:28:32 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AB2FD684-4217-44B4-BBBC-BEADA7DB38F7@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/4aFbUumjkLJW-2JrSIMOF0xir-g>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:28:46 -0000
(Setting Reply-To once again - lets please reduce the crossposting and move the whole conversation onto tools-discuss@) I'm going to take up part of Carsten's argument now, attempting to wear no hats. I personally don't want a "delete n days after creation" type of policy. I could accept (and probably support) a "delete after n days of inactivity" policy where n was large - at least two meeting-cycles large, if not larger. This tool is being used for other things than working group minuting. There are teams that I am on that have used notes as places to develop things like tools implementation plans - the notes served a longer than a few (even 30) days purpose until the effort finished. I can see the same being useful for design teams, where the real artifacts that come out are emails to the list and drafts. The expectation, in my opinion, is that these should be expected to be there for awhile, but not _forever_. What I don't think is ok is carrying the need to redirect these urls a few years from now when the technology under them has moved on. URLs into this service shouldn't be placed in RFCs, giving us the burden to preserve the content and its location forever. Putting my tools team hat back on - hedgedoc does not (to my knowledge) support this autodelete concept at this time. We could make a feature request whether or not it ends up being something we decide to use. But should we decide to have such a delete policy, it would be some time before it is implemented. RjS On 9/16/21 9:47 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> In doing so, you've now also characterised others' positions in a disparaging way and expressed cynicism about the IETF process. I understand you may be frustrated, but I don't think doing so is constructive. > Mark, > > sometimes it is absolutely necessary to express how a discourse makes one feel. > > Yes, this discussion is frustrating and unlikely to lead anywhere good, and I have to choose my battles. > > I made my points, and I will shut up now. > > Grüße, Carsten >
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Mark Nottingham
- Content at notes.ietf.org is not archival Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Christian Huitema
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Michael Richardson
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Larry Masinter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Tero Kivinen
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Christian Huitema
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Carsten Bormann
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Qin Wu
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Carsten Bormann
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Qin Wu
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… tom petch
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Lloyd W
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Lloyd W
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … David Noveck
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann