Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is not archival
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 16 September 2021 22:16 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E715B3A0E32; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L8255EDkQkHR; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 498B33A0E2D; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id nn5-20020a17090b38c500b0019af1c4b31fso5852829pjb.3; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=693+hQlbPea3hHdyUv4U3o54fSAJP/HC9rFYr7gAbE8=; b=VjaUymo8QBwEPUo53AMCvOi8ooFDK5ZLYIuGICajBGnjiIsew1g7DO/6eZX5u01h44 GOQsJxqU+tWtqfQskLcIxk2Nz/yemWaGQogHtGQlCEjV+Qx2LEbUS3XgXOJsnPlz+QyP 4Ee9bOkjBx3WRB4E4rsDp9j1mIVwV839Q2lgcP1urjyIr4ryTjcaYRSPPp846w3ml1rb vUYARcJop/QLWo1ak9Bot9Lf0+bVkueq524JsGYcaYB6sDkLOoHOWEA5+6lfP/xERBJA PJyHdmg2QrmEQGIDxSCPSwRztr72CxTLQJUjnXEUfTk9ogM7QphzzHIq/oH4b9GWJEjE Abgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=693+hQlbPea3hHdyUv4U3o54fSAJP/HC9rFYr7gAbE8=; b=5TdAOFbANQWPR/hmjjU9SmhC/ei8ZIwiOGQ4J3jjKqKLGOLy3ABsyYG+MAzPWBMNcV jATU4991DnBN0N+qQpfnjUp4MrTB023ILVWwMKzi8rCfgtwv6baLQ1luRUsc2c0cxaQB Zmgk3uQuiNa2cG3ApfadlVtjQjTQBxcRQpUVrBGRxeUjxW/ONZ8iAzUT0v5Vbd9zFQJf Mk0pRlAoaJPeAagkhnJZqXbH1d39GPjohu21SttDRPDtteJXo5SZGMcEoFw6jx86Stjv vqPxd0PnQj0awbdkJwmniCCkuw19JFnimotU8xA6D1fK93M1edwJWwPB3wM58J80ZGGC pJ6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+MDts7ZsnN1MR4htvq4/e7MidL3GjsBeCIkM0mUJw/zT8cXul yAaE21pg/KTfbE5gthgpQkua3lZT2GVHdQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAfBRvXxUmLAXJu85OsWj5CKKZyCC2M8RCFoO+NHMy15jhKi451zziRpmNF1Fxwd7ODbS7MA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7503:: with SMTP id q3mr8448312pjk.161.1631830583714; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i7sm4129265pgd.56.2021.09.16.15.16.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is not archival
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <f2ea0c4f-9500-391d-b8d1-dcc3ac4a7b1c@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBOeKxO6KOWyC8WBqUxYyqAwqYdKOesBN+2nxtWAy17Mbg@mail.gmail.com> <ADDEE9BD-790B-4E44-982B-DAA15F50722A@tzi.org> <2B11D777-9D50-490F-B7C6-9DD769C789A6@mnot.net> <B6A2905B-6EB9-4A22-AD1A-10C4910408A2@tzi.org> <1534366.1631820151@dooku> <93bdbb89-4aca-267c-6970-11f1c307003d@gmail.com> <13291778-0f4c-58d8-4d8b-ec6928cdaae8@sit.fraunhofer.de>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c5d52554-063d-665c-34fe-a57bc60efb6d@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:16:18 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <13291778-0f4c-58d8-4d8b-ec6928cdaae8@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/EvOcZqm-3iH0OWeFouy2jIWURcw>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 22:16:31 -0000
On 17-Sep-21 09:14, Henk Birkholz wrote: > Minutes are not the only notes taken at notes.ietf.org. I would stop > using it, if things would simply disappear, obviously. How is this a > good idea? Henk, I may well be old-fashioned, but when I want something to be kept, I keep it: save it on my disk, and make sure it's in a directory that gets backed up routinely. Anybody who used geocities.com knows why. (I'm biased on this question. In about 1993 I tried to persuade Tim Berners-Lee to make an expiry date obligatory for every HTML page. I still think he was wrong to refuse.) It's also important to specify this from the start. We probably don't want rough notes to become part of the public record of standards activities, and subject to subpoena. Brian > > > On 16.09.21 23:09, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> On 17-Sep-21 07:22, Michael Richardson wrote: >>> >>> Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: >>> >> On 16. Sep 2021, at 09:46, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Or, just automatically delete notes 30 days after creation. >>> >>> > (Again, I don’t know whether this was a serious proposal. >> I’ll treat >>> > is as such for the purpose of this message.) >>> >>> Well, I'm serious. >>> I think 30 days might be way too long. >>> >>> WG and design team leaders should know to download minutes at the end of the >>> session. It's not hard. >>> But, in order to train that, the contents needs to disappear within the >> day, >>> and there will be some crying. Some WG session minutes will go away. >> >> One day is too short; back in the good old days, when most of us suffered >> jet lag after each meeting, a week to capture the minutes and copy-edit >> them was hardly enough. But I do agree, this is a major duty of WG chairs >> or secretaries, and needs to be done promptly. >> >> I wouldn't call it notes.ietf.org. I'd call it temp.ietf.org. Or at least, >> put everything in notes.ietf.org/temp/ and move it to notes.ietf.org/recycle/ >> after 30 days and then to /dev/null after another 30 days. Something like >> that, anyway, depending on how it would integrate with HedgeDoc. >> >> Brian >>> >>> > Collecting notes in our own service (as opposed to hackmd.io or Google >>> > docs) gives us more control. Another benefit of having a common >>> > service is that, after a while, everybody knows how to use it and >> we >>> > can integrate it into other tools. >>> >>> Agreed. >>> >>> >>
- Content at notes.ietf.org is not archival Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Christian Huitema
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Michael Richardson
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Larry Masinter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Tero Kivinen
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Christian Huitema
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Carsten Bormann
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Qin Wu
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Carsten Bormann
- RE: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Qin Wu
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… tom petch
- Re: [irsg] [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Lloyd W
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Lloyd W
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … David Noveck
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Content at notes.ietf.org is … Carsten Bormann