[aqm] AQM schemes: Queue length vs. delay based[aqm] AQM schemes: Queue length vs. delay based
Preethi Natarajan
2013-11-08
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/op2t5R0HxPjBY76zU7v7X5gYlQw/
203418
1074642
Re: [aqm] Immediate ECN: Autotuning AQM for RTTRe: [aqm] Immediate ECN: Autotuning AQM for RTT
John Leslie
2013-11-08
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/VQ51xphDwX5S8F7yDIpXWHKhO44/
203417
1074643
Re: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency BRe: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B
Akhtar, Shahid (Shahid)
2013-11-07
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/Io0BnnbEb8UJBW12lwRdE9BdygQ/
203416
1074647
[aqm] Immediate ECN: Autotuning AQM for RTT[aqm] Immediate ECN: Autotuning AQM for RTT
Bob Briscoe
2013-11-07
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/RE2tq5JTjAlpOwCAvwMCUcszENI/
203415
1074643
Re: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B - Comments on Fred's documentRe: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B - Comments on Fred's document
David Collier-Brown
2013-11-07
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/0sbf4EzMMoIZYFxMbHDtogMIA3U/
203414
1074647
Re: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency BRe: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B
gorry
2013-11-07
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/laV1Xg7I0Omn-GSw6hhcxGIYqu8/
203413
1074647
Re: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency BRe: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B
Fred Baker (fred)
2013-11-07
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/df5rV_B189My79rewVfZJVuXBqA/
203412
1074647
Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Bob Briscoe
2013-11-07
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/T_PYnN8cgVybjq5bosNUp-vJt1I/
203411
1074648
Re: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B - Comments on Fred's documentRe: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B - Comments on Fred's document
Akhtar, Shahid (Shahid)
2013-11-07
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/c_h78OB0Mmt6nLHzmDbACMy_v98/
203410
1074647
Re: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency BRe: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B
gorry
2013-11-07
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/for-33P-Yf1GCV6Y3YIDOp_JZXc/
203409
1074647
Re: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency BRe: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B
Akhtar, Shahid (Shahid)
2013-11-07
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/LYy7sWNc7X1XSiiA6jXG3fBSUGA/
203408
1074647
Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Piers O'Hanlon
2013-11-07
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/wGvFS2clTzPi_VikjUHuG2GYuDM/
203407
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
gorry
2013-11-06
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/z-aNEGCiYZjH9eU2Sv3llsAL-BU/
203406
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
gorry
2013-11-06
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/VDvl9PMt0mbFyQ0oLG3YFVPLs9k/
203405
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Joe Touch
2013-11-06
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/DudtsMLyzgkQ8Yk3LU0QBliHi6A/
203404
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Bob Briscoe
2013-11-06
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/U43AoC36vlCblogzRZvFIa1NCQw/
203403
1074648
Re: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency BRe: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B
David Ros
2013-11-06
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/4F1aj80qqUY5tkaLskuDUHvGVVo/
203402
1074647
Re: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency BRe: [aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B
Akhtar, Shahid (Shahid)
2013-11-06
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/-lyIaEcGmi3DGSkCEQnlEZS15tQ/
203401
1074647
[aqm] New AQM Kids on the block -- experimental evaluation of CoDel and PIE (and ARED)[aqm] New AQM Kids on the block -- experimental evaluation of CoDel and PIE (and ARED)
Naeem Khademi
2013-11-06
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/sM1_OuKlbPHbojQypHO8G8MHPFk/
203400
1074644
[aqm] Recommendations Draft discussion[aqm] Recommendations Draft discussion
Fred Baker (fred)
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/UP4aA6G12ulWJkfX1iHLPbYLtIM/
203399
1074645
[aqm] ECN use statement[aqm] ECN use statement
Scheffenegger, Richard
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/sB0qRVIxtDeOp5iGnXVtufMdCDc/
203398
1074646
[aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B[aqm] IETF88 Fri 08Nov13 - 12:30 Regency B
Scheffenegger, Richard
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/4epa0_aRnZwnGmjBjkq4y5iyr0w/
203397
1074647
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Andrew Mcgregor
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/Uh7M-ShRZyHvfV1McdSXskZAGsY/
203396
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Joe Touch
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/g185DrFIek3kkOEeFTEI1rlmp2Q/
203395
1074648
Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Suresh Krishnan
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/peXTvX9ICPPh6h0NsgCDR1fbe4k/
203394
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Bob Briscoe
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/FWINiVTN59Nf2g-dfoTdKF-A8H4/
203393
1074648
Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Bob Briscoe
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/QLDLphsVXyfFBrR_dDVCqpvcx0Q/
203392
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Joe Touch
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/vLqWH66yhBLKPIDCPaquN_psLcM/
203391
1074648
Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
philip.eardley
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/SfuluChBwloYQP82zY9KzurU2oE/
203390
1074648
Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Dirk Kutscher
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/Rc_xPpYnuEaaqBQoisoV2Yufzdk/
203389
1074648
Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] [tsvwg] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Piers O'Hanlon
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/j0zlD-IQNfczNN2A-0rhFGVUXLo/
203388
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Zhulei (A)
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/xaEqBLVrF4s4vfvTkvsrZq-rMJI/
203387
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Michael Menth
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/AvIw01q8alwfNwT54Fn6nP4Sjlw/
203386
1074648
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] [iccrg] AQM deployment status?Re: [aqm] [Bloat] [iccrg] AQM deployment status?
Bob Briscoe
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/SejG-imyBIyMZsGJW63PNrPGd-o/
203385
1074658
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Rong Pan (ropan)
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/do3-WawA-cVbp0hQW9Q6lQ45rx4/
203384
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Weixinpeng
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/KYg4n4gKVzKqyenmeqRphf91S1E/
203383
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Scheffenegger, Richard
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/0MVKyxN3jw54NQNrnGg7n_g-q7M/
203382
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Michael Welzl
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/hZy9FIBjjZKhLPAgZHHb7WnLtIA/
203381
1074648
Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?Re: [aqm] Who supports tsvwg adoption of adding ECN to L2 or tunnel protocols?
Bob Briscoe
2013-11-05
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/ut6jaBGuF6QtnjXNEPfCxxVZuMQ/
203380
1074648
Re: [aqm] [Bloat] DOCSIS 3.1 support for AQMRe: [aqm] [Bloat] DOCSIS 3.1 support for AQM
Greg White
2013-11-04
aqm
/arch/msg/aqm/Byh9y6BwLLd8YbLn5fCM6vcU-lw/
203379
1074649