Re: [76attendees] RFID

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 10 November 2009 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3673A690D for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:18:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nye-G0JVUW0E for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:18:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com (mail-ew0-f207.google.com [209.85.219.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320063A6809 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:18:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so3776840ewy.37 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:18:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CTknh8qq1kI7jAHaKdO5gEhj8ZSpshK5BZHzz8YEzCo=; b=QCBN76Erg1m9AEKL644vOLm6ROK8xrUWyhikFSLtXAVoFRA8D04DBZnEsU26GDQCAJ Q0c5AKVxzGCjSx6/miDHllBMIKlQU7aKwWCmBJHt+FkrfLQuuryGppBj1Bbh60T3W38V LCFzItSBUwLqKpiybHVSjG871oGN7YS2ObA2U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=iWVDjirpzx0U53y22ZeubCZ9Zewh9QPWYhk9x9qi6WtEyfXAWWDBNJZddxzQuaUm4w LOCh0b0hR3X2IVNQtdI6Ohmay5QN3BhMnwDjIXUt4HRZfKy09BpELS26C/YITOQkAe5w oVkFcjtryuYVeBzaF3iigGfNKpGvJm6goT/K4=
Received: by 10.213.23.201 with SMTP id s9mr8969078ebb.5.1257815916984; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:18:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?133.93.16.203? (host-16-203.meeting.ietf.org [133.93.16.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm7980626eyd.8.2009.11.09.17.18.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:18:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4AF8BF65.9060406@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:18:29 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <7BAB4E87-5B63-4FC9-A6CF-576EB180A6C0@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7BAB4E87-5B63-4FC9-A6CF-576EB180A6C0@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [76attendees] RFID
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:18:14 -0000

It's working pretty well after a couple of days shake-down.

Since my attendance at IETF sessions is and should be a matter
of record, I would be perfectly happy to swipe a reader at
the door.

BTW, our rules (RFC2418 section 3.1) state that the minutes
of each WG meeting should include a list of attendees. A great
advantage of the tags is that such a list can be generated
automatically. I'd like to see that.

I have no, zero, zilch privacy concerns about this. All of what
we do at the IETF is done in public and subject to the Note Well.
(The last sentence of the Note Well should perhaps be extended
slightly to cover "written, electronic, audio and video records".)

    Brian

On 2009-11-10 13:59, Fred Baker wrote:
> I'm sure this will come up in the IAOC survey next week, but I'm curious
> to ask now about the RFID experiment now that we have had a day or so
> using it.
> 
> What do people think of it? Is it useful/interesting? If we were to make
> it more functional, such as enabling it to be read at the door obviating
> the blue sheet, would that be a good direction? I recognize that there
> are security concerns; what would be the best way to obviate them?
> _______________________________________________
> 76attendees mailing list
> 76attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees
>