Re: [76attendees] RFID
"George, Wes E [NTK]" <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com> Tue, 10 November 2009 01:48 UTC
Return-Path: <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B563A68E0 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:48:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8RdxpadVMBA8 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:48:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from VA3EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (va3ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.12]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302903A67AF for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:48:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail180-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.253) by VA3EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.7.40.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.240.5; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:49:12 +0000
Received: from mail180-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail180-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368CB16581F6; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:49:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -42
X-BigFish: VS-42(zz542N98dN4015L9371Pzz1202hzz1033ILz2fh6bh87h43j61h)
X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0
X-FB-DOMAIN-IP-MATCH: fail
Received: from mail180-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail180-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1257817751764110_26519; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:49:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS029.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.246]) by mail180-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC75775004C; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:49:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdas1403.corp.sprint.com (144.229.32.12) by VA3EHSMHS029.bigfish.com (10.7.99.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.482.32; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:49:11 +0000
Received: from PLSWH02A.ad.sprint.com (PLSWH02A.corp.sprint.com [144.226.242.131]) by pdas1403.corp.sprint.com (Switch-3.3.2/Switch-3.3.2) with ESMTP id nAA1jaLX004482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:45:36 -0600 (CST)
Received: from PLSWM01C.ad.sprint.com ([144.226.242.77]) by PLSWH02A.ad.sprint.com ([2002:90e2:f283::90e2:f283]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:49:10 -0600
From: "George, Wes E [NTK]" <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:49:06 -0600
Thread-Topic: [76attendees] RFID
Thread-Index: AcphoxvBFDidkRodS4qY94GkvjTjwgAAdWSA
Message-ID: <F7EB0A7C707E39409A73CD0353242551A8873B2F02@PLSWM01C.ad.sprint.com>
References: <7BAB4E87-5B63-4FC9-A6CF-576EB180A6C0@cisco.com> <F7584C95-7C4F-4741-AB44-CB68B36D8937@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <F7584C95-7C4F-4741-AB44-CB68B36D8937@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Reverse-DNS: unknown
Cc: "76attendees@ietf.org" <76attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [76attendees] RFID
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:48:47 -0000
I like the concept. I do not have privacy concerns, given that even if you could determine the link between the RFID and my account, for your trouble you are the proud owner of mostly useless information, a lot of which you probably already know. It's not like the system asks for any sort of personal info that could be used maliciously (nor should it). I would argue that if you are actually that interested in me (or any other attendee) that there are much easier ways to get more useful information about me than to try to compromise a benign RFID system. I echo John's comments - too many instances of reader issues, site login problems, incorrect room/reader associations leading to incorrect records for this to be quite ready for primetime as a replacement for the bluesheets, but a great idea, and one we should continue to refine. I would recommend that if the folks undertaking this experiment are willing, we continue with the experiment for the next few meetings in order to work the kinks out and enhance the system (such as populating on Jabber/audio), perhaps with a dedicated mailing list for RFID issues/suggestions. Thanks, Wes -----Original Message----- From: 76attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:76attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John G. Scudder Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 8:12 PM To: Fred Baker Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org Subject: Re: [76attendees] RFID On Nov 10, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Fred Baker wrote: > What do people think of it? Is it useful/interesting? If we were to I'll go with "interesting". As for "useful", so far IMO the rough edges make this particular implementation a net negative -- in several meetings I've been in, various RFID reader related gremlins have interrupted the flow of the meeting. To get to "useful" the probability of needing to interrupt your train of thought and futz with the tech would have to be at least an order of magnitude less. I don't mind, that's why it's an experiment. --John _______________________________________________ 76attendees mailing list 76attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees This e-mail may contain Sprint Nextel Company proprietary information intended for the sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message.
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Jared Mauch
- [76attendees] RFID Fred Baker
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Derek Atkins
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Randy Bush
- Re: [76attendees] RFID vijay gill
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Randy Bush
- Re: [76attendees] RFID vijay gill
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Samuel Weiler
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Muhammad Yousaf
- Re: [76attendees] RFID John G. Scudder
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [76attendees] RFID vijay gill
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Lars Eggert
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Paul Hoffman
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Soininen, Jonne (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [76attendees] RFID John G. Scudder
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Scott Brim
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Randy Bush
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Ted Lemon
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [76attendees] RFID George, Wes E [NTK]
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Scott Brim
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Dae Young KIM
- Re: [76attendees] RFID YAO Jiankang
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Tony Hansen
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Shridhar Rao (shrirao)
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Wes Hardaker
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Joe Touch
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Rob Evans
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Samuel Weiler
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Ray.Bellis
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Pete Resnick
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Aaron Falk
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Scott Brim
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [76attendees] RFID John G. Scudder
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Joe Touch
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Tero Kivinen