Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)

Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Wed, 05 February 2020 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA4B1200A4 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:19:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SdstGfY2_pBn for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:19:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3855B120100 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:19:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.108]) by resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id zPPCi0SNJ0JsVzTxHiNTXY; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 23:19:35 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1580944775; bh=T3rQM6l84XFQjVQ0r+CkDjYcLUpeix6NC0lUBCGnhTw=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=RfPOWKGBXUiqhfSCI1NxJophxB0oF0560AntrRMF7DAilnWb3aWPzkpS28LRlrsf7 hLDM/Y976Z37Kx08qoaOu/OIMP/OSuil/l/b5/ZL8JEEFtvNrx1N4VS0SHhWnHw3gF +zvSi1nFU3z0ab61gnQ53uKu1dTUyDchkrzEEp/xkx6C5DfYC6YBBIW3Olzn0hUQk3 Kcsj8dhL79BrSfS1Bj81HToWPIwfOlONbrAUByJs7fJLD/ei7T0TEfnRueea4D7QIQ av/QlSYNUEsBj4ZqsPzRrOCKrU8lKslaJSA49eLlxjTZudEtuJKtIib3Z6fiiMq2sf V3FPjyAvzugxw==
Received: from [IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:1909:41e4:4efe:613f] ([IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:1909:41e4:4efe:613f]) by resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id zTxFivl9xlDXezTxFinDOx; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 23:19:34 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0.00;st=legit
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org, iab@iab.org, last-call@ietf.org
References: <158094293707.31222.730373457433066701.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <be64994d-89eb-690b-ae97-b21626415504@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 18:19:32 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <158094293707.31222.730373457433066701.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/ykHP_Gh9o82P-2BoH8eKfGzi4f0>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 23:19:38 -0000

On 2/5/2020 5:48 PM, IAB Executive Administrative Manager wrote:
> This is an announcement of an IETF-wide Call for Comment on
> draft-iab-for-the-users-02.
>
> The document is being considered for publication as an Informational RFC
> within the IAB stream, and is available for inspection at:
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-for-the-users/>
>
> The Call for Comment will last until 2020-03-04. Please send comments to
> architecture-discuss@ietf.org and iab@iab.org.
>
> Abstract:
>
>     This document explains why the IAB believes the IETF should consider
>     end users as its highest priority concern, and how that can be done.
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

Does this document represent an IAB consensus/aspiration or is this Mark 
writing as an IAB member?

If the former, Mark should be listed as Editor, and the document should 
include text indicating how the IAB arrived at consensus (e.g. "This 
document represents the consensus of the IAB arrived at through 
(internal discussions | discussions with the community | workshop 
results | etc) " ).   If the latter, the document should indicate "This 
document represents the author's personal opinion".

Later, Mike