IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] (no subject)

Devdas Bhagat <devdas@dvb.homelinux.org> Tue, 27 April 2004 19:15 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA22787 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:15:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIXzz-0000P3-Ec for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:12:07 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3RJC7pf001539 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:12:07 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIXxB-0007Cc-PI for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:09:13 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA21644 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:09:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIXx6-0002gv-Dg for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:09:08 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIXwP-0002Za-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:08:26 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIXvQ-0002PB-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:07:24 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIXkR-00066L-3t; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:56:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIXeh-0005Uf-Eb for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:50:07 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA19721 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:50:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIXec-0000X7-IJ for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:50:02 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIXdj-0000Sh-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:49:07 -0400
Received: from [66.98.212.93] (helo=tin.nixcartel.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIXdJ-0000OG-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:48:41 -0400
Received: from dvb.homelinux.org (unknown [202.88.170.34]) by tin.nixcartel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DEE1AC06C for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:53:21 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by dvb.homelinux.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0CCB834022; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:18:20 +0530 (IST)
From: Devdas Bhagat <devdas@dvb.homelinux.org>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] (no subject)
Message-ID: <20040428001819.A18364@evita.devdas.geek>
Reply-To: Devdas Bhagat <devdas@dvb.homelinux.org>
References: <C6DDA43B91BFDA49AA2F1E473732113E5DBBC3@mou1wnexm05.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <C6DDA43B91BFDA49AA2F1E473732113E5DBBC3@mou1wnexm05.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>; from pbaker@verisign.com on Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:46:41AM -0700
X-Message-Flag: Friends protect friends from Microsoft
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:18:19 +0530
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60

On 27/04/04 09:46 -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
<snip>
> currently necessary due to blacklist idiocy. BTW the whole of Spain
> is currently blacklisted.
No. Only Telefonica, and that by a single DNSBL. Only the users of that
DNSBL will block Telefonica hosts.
On the other hand, outside the US, bandwidth is much more expensive and
any form of filtering that during or after the data phase is more
expensive than JHD. Could we please keep this fact in mind when
discussing solutions?

Devdas Bhagat

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email