Re: [Asrg] (no subject)
Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> Thu, 29 April 2004 03:33 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (www.iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA14090 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:33:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJ2FJ-0002Xs-96 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:29:57 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3T3TveY009779 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:29:57 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJ27c-0001LN-CT for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:22:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA13470 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:21:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJ27X-0002bS-GS for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:21:55 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJ26c-0002U7-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:20:59 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJ25w-0002NI-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:20:16 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJ1yw-0007TI-LB; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:13:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJ1v3-0006Wt-P2 for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:09:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA12874 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:08:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJ1ux-00019D-K3 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:08:56 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJ1t6-0000wm-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:07:02 -0400
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJ1r8-0000jS-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:04:58 -0400
Received: from pcls1.std.com ([192.74.137.141] helo=TheWorld.com) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BJ1aq-0005dy-9I for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:48:08 -0400
Received: from world.std.com (root@world-e.std.com [69.38.147.5]) by TheWorld.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3T2lXbr020102; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:47:33 -0400
Received: (from bzs@localhost) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA21785; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:47:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16528.27844.324796.238684@world.std.com>
To: "Roger B.A. Klorese " <rogerk@queernet.org>
Cc: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>, "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, John Levine <asrg@johnlevine.com>, asrg@ietf.org, richard_willey@symantec.com
Subject: Re: [Asrg] (no subject)
In-Reply-To: <409031A9.2010809@queernet.org>
References: <C6DDA43B91BFDA49AA2F1E473732113E5DBBE5@mou1wnexm05.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <16528.11346.656296.255405@world.std.com> <409031A9.2010809@queernet.org>
X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:47:32 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Then I would suggest not designing the it like that. Why is there this prevalent belief that if one doesn't like an approach, for some other reason, the right thing to do is to propose a really bad design for it and then assert that those design flaws make the original idea untenable? I can't imagine, for example, anyone ever having approved the original DNS proposals if this were the atmosphere. And that was back in, what, 1983? Imagine! A series of query-response transactions down through a tree of hosts just to map a host name to an IP number! Couldn't ever work! Do you have any idea how many host names, between mail and ftp and everything else people do, are looked up *per second*?! etc etc etc. Anyhow, does anyone else see how futile it is if a proposal is immediately jumped on with "Too many computrons!!!", unless there's something terribly inherent to the proposal, like you have to break a significant crypto code to send mail? I don't think mere recordkeeping, authorization, etc qualifies as a priori sort of too many computrons. On April 28, 2004 at 15:35 rogerk@queernet.org (Roger B.A. Klorese ) wrote: > Barry Shein wrote: > > >E-mail transactions, philip, that was the original assertion I was > >responding to, not my assertion. What you are responding to is > >anybody's guess. > > > > > > > The idea, Barry, is that the business transaction (as in database and > application interaction -- you know, what 99% of the IT world thiks of > when you say "transaction") that is needed to support postage is likely > to be much heavier-weight than the protocol interaction that is required > to deliver the message itself. -- -Barry Shein Software Tool & Die | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202 | Login: 617-739-WRLD The World | Public Access Internet | Since 1989 *oo* _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] (no subject) curvers
- [Asrg] (no subject) Mark McCarron
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Danny Angus
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Mark McCarron
- RE: *Suspected Spam *RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Danny Angus
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] (no subject) Patrick Galvin
- [Asrg] (no subject) John Fenley
- [Asrg] (no subject) Kurt Magnusson
- [Asrg] (no subject) Kurt Magnusson
- [Asrg] (no subject) Richard Willey
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) John Levine
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Devdas Bhagat
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- The end result of E-postage (was Re: [Asrg] (no s… Alan DeKok
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Roger B.A. Klorese
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) "Roger B.A. Klorese "
- [Asrg] E-postage from first principles John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Jonathan Morton
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Jonathan Morton
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage John Levine
- [Asrg] Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Roger B.A. Klorese
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage John Levine
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) "Roger B.A. Klorese"
- Re: [Asrg] 3 (Message Verification) - Viability o… Jonathan Morton
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- [Asrg] (no subject) Paul Lambert