Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles

John Levine <asrg@johnlevine.com> Thu, 29 April 2004 18:03 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA17457 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:03:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJFpd-0000im-9U for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:00:21 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3TI0LHE002772 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:00:21 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJFff-0006q8-1E for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:50:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16513 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:50:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJFfZ-0006x2-Hb for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:49:57 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJFeQ-0006as-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:48:46 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJFde-0006Gm-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:47:58 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJFFp-00073g-6R; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:23:21 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJF7D-0004sr-1V for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:14:27 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA14358 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:14:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJF77-0004gz-PP for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:14:21 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJF68-0004RA-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:13:20 -0400
Received: from xuxa.iecc.com ([208.31.42.42]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJF5B-0004BB-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:12:21 -0400
Received: (qmail 12314 invoked by uid 100); 29 Apr 2004 17:12:24 -0000
Message-ID: <20040429171224.12313.qmail@xuxa.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <asrg@johnlevine.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles
In-Reply-To: <E569729E-99B9-11D8-A28E-000393863768@chromatix.demon.co.uk>
Organization: I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA
Cc: chromi@chromatix.demon.co.uk
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:12:24 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

>A good summary, John.

Thanks.

>> Receipient rate limiting might take the form of hashcash, although
>> that seems too easily circumvented so long as the bad guys have
>> zombies to do their hashing.
>
>This is a quantitative rather than qualitative argument against 
>hashcash, which is easily answered by increasing the bit count demanded 
>by the recipient, if it seems it's not having enough effect.

The problem is that if you increase the bit count demanded from the
bad guys, you also increase the bit count demanded from the good guys.
Since the bad guys have more computers at their disposal than the good
guys do, if you demand a big enough hash from the bad guys to deter
them, you're going to lock out the good guys altogether, e.g., demand
a hash from Aunt Sadie that will limit her 486 to one e-mail message a
week.

You might want to demand larger hashes from bad guys from good guys,
but if you could tell which was which, you could reject the bad guys'
mail outright and dispense with the hashes.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
http://www.taugh.com


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg