RE: [Asrg] (no subject)

> Yeah well via some creative editing you managed to reverse my point
> and create a straw man to argue with.

Not at all, the argument you made was spurious under either interpretation.

> I countred that the fact that we obviously handle those 5B msgs/day
> would not seem to argue AGAINST the possibility of adding a little
> more processing to each, it would seem to argue FOR the possibility.

It would seem to me to be at best completely and utterly irrelevant.
The ability to move an email message without any form of authentication
whatsover does not seem to argue for the possibility of moving a
payment with that email.

The fact that the volume is 5 billion a day does argue that any 
settlement system is going to have to be substantial. 

> But a proof? No, not a proof, not either way. Which was my point
> exactly.

Actually your claim was:

>  > > Obviously if we can deliver that many emails per day 
> THEN WE CLEARLY
>  > > CAN HANDLE THAT MANY TRANSACTIONS PER DAY! Nicht wahr?

I don't know how you expected this statement to be interpreted.
I will merely observe that if the French had not rescued you 
from certain defeat at Yorktown you would now be speaking English.

		Phill

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg