IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Asrg] (no subject)

"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> Tue, 27 April 2004 19:46 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA24909 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:46:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIYQL-0006ex-RV for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:39:21 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3RJdLnb025591 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:39:21 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIYJR-0005Fi-2i for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:32:13 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA24270 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:32:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIYJN-0005Sv-KK for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:32:09 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIYIb-0005Nl-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:31:22 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIYHs-0005Hq-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:30:36 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIYDQ-0004Ql-Tl; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:26:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIYBc-0004BG-Cz for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:24:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA23626 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:24:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIYBZ-0004Ld-46 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:24:05 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIYAd-0004Gs-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:23:07 -0400
Received: from pigeon.verisign.com ([65.205.251.71]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIYAL-0004CM-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:22:49 -0400
Received: from mou1wnexc01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (verisign.com [65.205.251.53]) by pigeon.verisign.com (8.12.11/) with ESMTP id i3RJMeX8029162; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mou1wnexc01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <JPK1K70K>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:22:40 -0700
Message-ID: <C6DDA43B91BFDA49AA2F1E473732113E5DBBCF@mou1wnexm05.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
To: 'Devdas Bhagat' <devdas@dvb.homelinux.org>, asrg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Asrg] (no subject)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:22:38 -0700
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

> On the other hand, outside the US, bandwidth is much more 
> expensive and
> any form of filtering that during or after the data phase is more
> expensive than JHD. Could we please keep this fact in mind when
> discussing solutions?

I don't think it is relevant for two reasons:

1) Bandwidth costs are dropping pretty much everywhere. 

2) Deterrence is a viable strategy.

In the long term it does not matter if you filter before or after the
message is received, provided you block a sufficient proportion of spam
to make the business uneconomic.

		Phill

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email