Re: [Asrg] (no subject)
John Levine <asrg@johnlevine.com> Tue, 27 April 2004 16:25 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (www.iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA10184 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:25:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIV3H-0004AR-Vq for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:03:20 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3RG3JlI016019 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:03:19 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIUyT-0002qv-Pj for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:58:21 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA08823 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:58:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIUyQ-00009c-ER for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:58:18 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIUxG-0007mI-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:57:07 -0400
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIUvs-0007Xd-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:55:40 -0400
Received: from optimus22.ietf.org ([132.151.6.22] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BIUvv-0003W5-JB for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:55:43 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIUkb-00080J-29; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:44:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIUUJ-0003Pg-MR for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:27:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA07242 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:27:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIUUG-0005kG-Ei for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:27:08 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIUTU-0005fm-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:26:21 -0400
Received: from xuxa.iecc.com ([208.31.42.42]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIUSo-0005bu-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:25:38 -0400
Received: (qmail 28306 invoked by uid 100); 27 Apr 2004 15:25:39 -0000
Message-ID: <20040427152539.28305.qmail@xuxa.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <asrg@johnlevine.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] (no subject)
In-Reply-To: <c6lsjd$be7$1@xuxa.iecc.com>
Organization: I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA
Cc: richard_willey@symantec.com
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:25:39 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
>One set of exchanges occurs went I communicate with a relatively small >group of individuals with whom I have some sort of trust relationship: ... Yup. Since spammers will try to sneak in there, you need some sort of hard to break authentication to identify their mail. Maybe something like domain keys will do the trick. S/MIME sure hasn't. Any suggestions? >However, there is a second set of email exchages that I need to consider. >On occasion, I receive emails from "random" individuals with whom I don't >have any kind of pre-existing trust relationship. >While these exchanges are relatively infrequent, they often contain >important information. Agreed. How much do you expect people to be willing to pay you in order or how many hoops will they be willing to jump through in order to send you important information? >Personally, I think that the Micro-Payment systems offer the best >approach. This is technology that is going to be adopted / deployed >anyway and I'd just as soon piggyback off it. I eagerly await your discussion of how you expect people to build a micropayment system that will handle a useful amount of mail (a good beta size would be five billion messages a day), run at a cost that people would be willing to pay (closer to a penny a message than to a dollar a message), and won't be subverted by spammers using fake postage, used postage, hijacked machines, and a dozen other scams we haven't thought of yet. Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY http://www.taugh.com PS: This discussion reminds me of people saying that current automobiles are unsatisfactory because the fuel is dirty and expensive, therefore future cars will run on water. Water is plentiful and ecologically benign. I don't have any idea how a water-powered car would work and neither does anyone else, but I think that cars will run on water anyway. _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] (no subject) curvers
- [Asrg] (no subject) Mark McCarron
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Danny Angus
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Mark McCarron
- RE: *Suspected Spam *RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Danny Angus
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] (no subject) Patrick Galvin
- [Asrg] (no subject) John Fenley
- [Asrg] (no subject) Kurt Magnusson
- [Asrg] (no subject) Kurt Magnusson
- [Asrg] (no subject) Richard Willey
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) John Levine
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Devdas Bhagat
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- The end result of E-postage (was Re: [Asrg] (no s… Alan DeKok
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Roger B.A. Klorese
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) "Roger B.A. Klorese "
- [Asrg] E-postage from first principles John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Jonathan Morton
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Jonathan Morton
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage John Levine
- [Asrg] Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Roger B.A. Klorese
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage John Levine
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) "Roger B.A. Klorese"
- Re: [Asrg] 3 (Message Verification) - Viability o… Jonathan Morton
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- [Asrg] (no subject) Paul Lambert