[Asrg] (no subject)
"Paul Lambert" <PaulLambert@AirgoNetworks.Com> Wed, 29 December 2004 04:23 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA01845 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:23:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjVXy-0001HG-47 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:34:54 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CjVL7-00033Q-1N; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:21:37 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CjVJF-00028A-Jc for asrg@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:19:41 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA01631 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:19:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from wnifwl.woodsidenet.com ([65.192.186.2] helo=WNIMAIL.WoodsideNet.Com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjVUH-0001AA-OB for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:31:07 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:19:08 -0800
Message-ID: <3FFBC907DD03A34CA4410C5C745DEB120514499D@wnimail.WoodsideNet.Com>
Thread-Index: AcTtWOvo5pi6AUuTQJeuf1rezudxogAAy2nw
From: Paul Lambert <PaulLambert@AirgoNetworks.Com>
To: Devdas Bhagat <devdas@dvb.homelinux.org>, asrg@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Asrg] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> -----Original Message----- > From: asrg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:asrg-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Devdas Bhagat .. > > No ... spam is subjective. Formaly deciding what is or is > not spam is > > the wrong way to proceed. > > The objective definition of spam is Unsolicited Bulk Messaging. > Spam is not about content, it's about consent. So what? The consent depends on the content and the originator. There is nothing else to measure or examine. > And you trust the creator on what basis? We already have > spammers spoofing headers, so can you tell me why they will > not spoof the tags? My post clearly listed digital signatures as a mechanism. > > One rather well known way of tagging the message is to use > GPG/PGP or S/MIME signatures. > If the signature validates, you know the mail came from > someone with access to the private key, presumably the owner > of the key. > > We all know how well that is working out. So what... I was not describing PGP or S/MIME. Do you have a useful contribution to make by these comments? Paul _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] (no subject) curvers
- [Asrg] (no subject) Mark McCarron
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Danny Angus
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Mark McCarron
- RE: *Suspected Spam *RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Danny Angus
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] (no subject) Patrick Galvin
- [Asrg] (no subject) John Fenley
- [Asrg] (no subject) Kurt Magnusson
- [Asrg] (no subject) Kurt Magnusson
- [Asrg] (no subject) Richard Willey
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) John Levine
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Devdas Bhagat
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- The end result of E-postage (was Re: [Asrg] (no s… Alan DeKok
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Roger B.A. Klorese
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) "Roger B.A. Klorese "
- [Asrg] E-postage from first principles John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Jonathan Morton
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Jonathan Morton
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage John Levine
- [Asrg] Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Roger B.A. Klorese
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage John Levine
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] (no subject) "Roger B.A. Klorese"
- Re: [Asrg] 3 (Message Verification) - Viability o… Jonathan Morton
- [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage David Maxwell
- [Asrg] (no subject) Paul Lambert