RE: [Asrg] (no subject)

"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> Wed, 28 April 2004 03:21 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA20591 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:21:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIfYr-0001oT-6e for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:16:37 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3S3GbNa006965 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:16:37 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIfUz-0001Ly-G8 for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:12:37 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA20045 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:12:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIfUv-0001Tw-KA for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:12:33 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIfRs-000137-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:09:26 -0400
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIfQ2-0000fu-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:07:30 -0400
Received: from optimus22.ietf.org ([132.151.6.22] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BIfM3-0006sP-EF for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:03:24 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIfIo-0008Du-Dw; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:00:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIfCe-0007UU-3L for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:53:40 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA19184 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:53:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIfCY-0006Ix-Fc for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:53:34 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIfBf-00069c-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:52:40 -0400
Received: from peacock.verisign.com ([65.205.251.73]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIfAn-0005zO-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:51:45 -0400
Received: from mou1wnexc02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (verisign.com [65.205.251.54]) by peacock.verisign.com (8.12.11/) with ESMTP id i3S2pmDu006162; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mou1wnexc02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <JPKJM8H9>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:51:48 -0700
Message-ID: <C6DDA43B91BFDA49AA2F1E473732113E5DBBD3@mou1wnexm05.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
To: 'Barry Shein' <bzs@world.std.com>, John Levine <asrg@johnlevine.com>
Cc: asrg@ietf.org, richard_willey@symantec.com
Subject: RE: [Asrg] (no subject)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:51:47 -0700
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,NO_COST autolearn=no version=2.60

> 5 billion transactions per day doesn't impress me as proof positive
> of anything, particularly world-wide.
> 
> Obviously if we can deliver that many emails per day THEN WE CLEARLY
> CAN HANDLE THAT MANY TRANSACTIONS PER DAY! Nicht wahr?

The fact we perform 5 billion transactions with no charge mechanism in an
entirely decentralized fashion does not provide an existence proof for
being able to resolve 5 billion charge transactions.

VeriSign handles 5 billion transactions a day and many milions of payment
transactions, they even flow through some of the same systems. But they
are not directly equivalent. A single payment transaction costs several 
hundred times more to support than a single DNS transaction.

Funny thing is that the minute I suggest accreditation, which would
involve each mail server requiring an SSL cert equivalent we have people
railing against 'the VeriSign tax'. Then folk go and suggest a payment
system which will inevitably require micropayments. Go work out where
the cybercash IP is owned.

I don't see the market opportunity here. Setting up a system that could
handle the demands is certainly possible, it is already in place for the 
telephone. But the telephone markets are trending towards flat fee 
charging.


		Phill

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg