[Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage

John Levine <asrg@johnlevine.com> Thu, 29 April 2004 22:10 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA06035 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:10:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJJfK-0005Qi-El for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:06:01 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3TM5wNw020872 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:05:58 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJJRJ-00088q-TZ for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:51:29 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA04659 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:51:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJJRC-0001Rs-6v for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:51:22 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJJQG-0001QE-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:50:25 -0400
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJJPq-0001OQ-01 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:49:58 -0400
Received: from optimus22.ietf.org ([132.151.6.22] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BJJN7-000230-9b for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:47:09 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJJEi-000518-JR; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:38:28 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BJJ11-000051-1B for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:24:19 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA03401 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:24:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BJJ0t-00006y-I2 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:24:11 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BJIyd-0007WF-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:21:52 -0400
Received: from xuxa.iecc.com ([208.31.42.42]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BJIvN-0006zJ-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:18:29 -0400
Received: (qmail 10900 invoked by uid 100); 29 Apr 2004 21:18:32 -0000
Message-ID: <20040429211832.10899.qmail@xuxa.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <asrg@johnlevine.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20040429180403.GI22336@mail>
Organization: I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA
Cc: david@vex.net
Subject: [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:18:32 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

>Now several things can happen in the state graph.
>
>a. Sender has no more msgs to devlier anyway.
>b. Sender has more, and follows Recip's desired 1/h
>	- At some point, Recip decides that Sender has been faithful,
>		and may be allowed a higher rate.
>c. Sender has more, and ignores Recip's desired 1/h
>	- Sender is blacklisted.
>
>Optionally:
>
>d. Sender has more, and requests a higher rate allowance by providing
>	an accreditation, hashcash, 'introduction protocol' referral ID,
>	etc.
>e. Sender provides a one-time, or reusable key that was provided out of
>	band by recipient - i.e. when signing up for a mailing list -
>	which entitles Sender to a higher rate limit.

f. Sender pretends to be 300 other people and sends you buckets of spam.

Bad guys won't play by your rules.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
http://www.taugh.com

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg