Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article

"Alan DeKok" <aland@freeradius.org> Mon, 05 May 2003 14:24 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA04003 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:24:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h45EWKA05325 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:32:20 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h45EWK805322 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:32:20 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA03993; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:23:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Cgug-0006Ac-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 10:25:55 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Cgug-0006AY-00; Mon, 05 May 2003 10:25:54 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h45EU4805199; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:30:04 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h45ETk805157 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:29:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA03913 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2003 10:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19CgsC-00069F-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 10:23:20 -0400
Received: from giles.striker.ottawa.on.ca ([192.139.46.36] helo=mail.nitros9.org ident=root) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Cgs7-000695-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 10:23:15 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=giles.striker.ottawa.on.ca ident=aland) by mail.nitros9.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1) id 19Ch3d-0006bG-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 10:35:09 -0400
From: Alan DeKok <aland@freeradius.org>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 04 May 2003 16:11:01 PDT." <aT5vaIe86J8qbrF9002@x>
Message-Id: <E19Ch3d-0006bG-00@mail.nitros9.org>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 10:35:09 -0400

Scott Nelson <scott@spamwolf.com> wrote:
> The questions I have are;
> What percentage of the people who use it will use it improperly?
> And what happens when it's used improperly?

  If the sender uses RMX "improperly", then the receiver sees that RMX
doesn't match the originating MTA.  The receiver can then decide to
treat the message more negatively, than messages where the RMX does
match.  So the sender gets punished for being stupid.

  If the receiver doesn't use RMX properly, then they will make bad
decisions about what's spam, and what's not.  So the receiver gets
punished (by potentially losing mail), for being stupid.

  I don't see any problem here.

  Alan DeKok.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg