Re: [Autoconf] Autoconf addressing model

"Teco Boot" <teco@inf-net.nl> Thu, 05 March 2009 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E3928C40B for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:13:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.778
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.778 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.268, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oTC80IRQh4uJ for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hpsmtp-eml17.kpnxchange.com (hpsmtp-eml17.KPNXCHANGE.COM [213.75.38.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F177828C405 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpsmtp-eml104.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.84.104]) by hpsmtp-eml17.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:14:06 +0100
Received: from M90Teco ([86.83.9.22]) by cpsmtp-eml104.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:14:06 +0100
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
To: 'Alexandru Petrescu' <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <499F0BA7.90501@piuha.net> <49AD5184.6080300@gmail.com> <000101c99c3c$3121a870$9364f950$@nl><49AD9760.3080909@gmail.com> <49AD98D4.3@earthlink.net><49AD9EA8.6040803@gmail.com> <49ADA17B.9040600@earthlink.net><49ADAF7C.1050509@gmail.com> <49ADB9FB.6050600@earthlink.net> <49AE3A3A.5000305@gmail.com> <7FB7EE0A621BA44B8B69E5F0A09DC76407B5D783@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com> <49AE9827.5090309@gmail.com> <7FB7EE0A621BA44B8B69E5F0A09DC76407B5D803@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com> <49AEBA6D.7030903@gmail.com> <7FB7EE0A621BA44B8B69E5F0A09DC76407B5DB1F@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com> <49AF97FA.70200! 07@gmail.com> <002201c99d76$017d4b20$0477e160$@nl> <49AFAA15.9! 060905@gmail.com> <003a01c99d8e$f47ba2f0$dd72e8d0$@nl> <49AFD85E.50403! 01@gmail.com> <004a01c99d9b$542e1e10$fc8a5a30$@nl> <49AFDE93.60! 904@gmail.com> <004b01c99da1$dc4ab9b0$94e02d10$@nl> <49AFEB3C! .8010703@gmail.com> <004c01c99da7$ee315700$ca940500$@nl> <49AFF! 2B7.2060600@gmail.com> <005701c99db0$adbc6620$09353260$@nl> <49B 0026F.5070905@gmail.co m>
In-Reply-To: <49B0026F.5070905@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:14:07 +0100
Message-ID: <006401c99db5$cad6dc90$608495b0$@nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcmdskVZSJJpFDLNSjiyXnScCr9J0QAAfZ5g
Content-Language: nl
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2009 17:14:06.0785 (UTC) FILETIME=[CA718B10:01C99DB5]
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Autoconf addressing model
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:13:39 -0000

OK, we can start with a single interface setup:
Agreed on the starting point with three nodes, and non-transitivity solved
by MANET Routing?

                              
                           <-------------------------v-------->
<------v-------------------------->                  |
   <---|----------------------v----------------------|--->
       |                      |                      |
       |2001:db8:1::1/64      |2001:db8:2::2/64      |2001:db8:3::3/64
       |fe80::1/64            |fe80::2/64            |fe80::3/64
   +---+---+              +---+---+              +---+---+
   |Router1|              |Router2|              |Router3|
   +-------+              +-------+              +-------+


Routing table Router1:
Destination       Next-hop    Hops
===============   ========    ====
2001:db8:2::/64   fe80::2     1
2001:db8:3::/64   fe80::2     2

Routing table Router2:
Destination       Next-hop    Hops
===============   ========    ====
2001:db8:1::/64   fe80::1     1
2001:db8:3::/64   fe80::3     1

Routing table Router3:
Destination       Next-hop    Hops
===============   ========    ====
2001:db8:1::/64   fe80::2     2
2001:db8:2::/64   fe80::2     1

I see a problem with this, who has assigned the globally unique prefixes?
Manually configured? Is it intended to connect to the Internet? Is the
Access Router known on forehand?
Maybe it is better to start with ULA as the most basic setup.


Teco.