Re: [Autoconf] Autoconf addressing model

"Teco Boot" <> Thu, 05 March 2009 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D779C28C4D9 for <>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:29:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.785
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.785 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.261, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DT4mGLNSUnaI for <>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (cpsmtpo-eml06.KPNXCHANGE.COM []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3AA28C4D8 for <>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) by with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:29:58 +0100
Received: from M90Teco ([]) by with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:29:58 +0100
From: "Teco Boot" <>
To: "'Dearlove, Christopher \(UK\)'" <>, "'Alexandru Petrescu'" <>
References: <> <> <000101c99c3c$3121a870$9364f950$@nl><> <><> <><> <><> <> <> <> <> <><49AF97FA.70200!><002201c99d76$017d4b20$0477e160$@nl> <49AFAA15.9!> <003a01c99d8e$f47ba2f0$dd72e8d0$@nl><49AFD85E.50403!><004a01c99d9b$542e1e10$fc8a5a30$@nl> <49AFDE93.60!> <004b01c99da1$dc4ab9b0$94e02d10$@nl> <49AFEB3C!> <004c01c99da7$ee315700$ca940500$@nl><49AFF!><005701c99db0$adbc6620$09353260$@nl> <49B 0026F.50! 70905@gma m> < 006401c99db5$cad6dc90$608495b0$@nl> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D01A449C1@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
In-Reply-To: <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D01A449C1@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:29:59 +0100
Message-ID: <006b01c99db8$022f7e20$068e7a60$@nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcmdskVZSJJpFDLNSjiyXnScCr9J0QAAfZ5gAABwngAAADLCkA==
Content-Language: nl
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2009 17:29:58.0579 (UTC) FILETIME=[01C1C830:01C99DB8]
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Autoconf addressing model
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:29:30 -0000

OK, I can agree. My point was verifying that we had the basic setup. Assume
a bootstrapping setup of a disconnected network, then we would not have the
2001: prefix. A self-generated ULA prefix can be used. As a next step, the
globally unique addresses can be added or may replace the ULA.


|-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
|Van: Dearlove, Christopher (UK) []
|Verzonden: donderdag 5 maart 2009 18:19
|Aan: Teco Boot; Alexandru Petrescu
|Onderwerp: RE: [Autoconf] Autoconf addressing model
|> I see a problem with this, who has assigned the globally unique
|Isn't that (part of) the problem this group is to address?
|At this point we are specifying a requirement that (assuming
|that model, which I'm not commenting on) such prefixes are
|to be assigned. How it happens (as long as it's possible, and
|manual configuration, though not the required solution, is
|presumably an existence proof for that) is not the issue
|right now.
|This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
|recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
|recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
|You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
|distribute its contents to any other person.