[CCAMP] 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09
Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com> Tue, 13 November 2012 06:32 UTC
Return-Path: <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C4B21F88D1 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:32:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.782
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.782 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VuI5+7EAxQcG for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:32:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CBE21F88D5 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:32:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ALL98326; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:32:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:32:26 +0000
Received: from SZXEML415-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.154) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:32:33 +0000
Received: from SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.218]) by szxeml415-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.154]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:32:22 +0800
From: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09
Thread-Index: AQHNwWii+NnitfEkvkiUJngM9Kbwew==
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:32:21 +0000
Message-ID: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF83582F514@SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <50733BED.8090304@labn.net> <5081DCC1.60202@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <5081DCC1.60202@labn.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.72.85]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [CCAMP] 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:32:42 -0000
Hi Lou and all, A new version has been submitted with the udpates based on the comments from Lou. Please see more in-line below marked with [Fatai]. Best Regards Fatai -----邮件原件----- 发件人: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Lou Berger 发送时间: 2012年10月20日 7:06 收件人: CCAMP; draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework@tools.ietf.org 主题: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09 Authors, I have the following LC comments: General comment: - I have a comment related to the info document, that I'll cover in a separate mail on the info-model document . - I found appendix A to not be very informative and thing there are better examples in the other documents, suggest either moving one ore more to this document or drop the appendix. [Fatai] The appendix has been dropped, because we think it is better to keep the examples in the other documents. The remaining comments are editorial in nature - Please verify that abbreviations are defined before being used . There are a number of these. [Fatai] Checked and updated. - Please use a consistent decimal representation (sometimes commas are used other times periods) [Fatai] Checked and commas are used. - the references [G709-v1] and [G709-v3] each actually refer to multiple documents, each documented needs to have it's own (correct) reference, i.g., [G709-v1] and [G709-v1a1]. The document text will need to be revisited to ensure the proper reference is made. [Fatai] [G709-V3A2] is introduced and referenced in the right place. - http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09.txt shows there are unresolved nits that need to resolved . I'm using line numbers from this url in my subsequent comments. - Line 46: How about replace "as consented in October 2009" with "as published in 2009." [Fatai] Accepted. - Line 255: Drop "approved in 2009" the reference is sufficient [Fatai] Accepted. - Line 260: suggest the following change: OLD 2.5Gb/s 1.25Gb/s Nominal Bit rate NEW Time Slot Granularity 2.5Gb/s 1.25Gb/s Nominal Bit rate [Fatai] Accepted. - Lines 272-274: Please add the appropriate reference to G.709 section or table that points to where one finds the information on determining actual bit rate. [Fatai] Accepted. - Line 307: suggest changing "into the OTUk" --> "into a specific OTUk" [Fatai] Accepted. - Line 340/1: need a reference to where this is defined. [Fatai] Accepted and added. - Line 346-347: Need a reference to where this behavior is defined. [Fatai] Accepted and added. - Lines 387/388. Isn't this sentence OBE and should be dropped? [Fatai] Accepted. - Page 11, RWA is used in a few places on this page as is OCh layer, suggest replacing all instances of RWA with OCH or "OCh layer". [Fatai] Accepted. - Line 500: what do you mean by "including OCh layer visibility."? this isn't really reflected in the solutions documents (other than as MLN). [Fatai] Deleted to avoid ambiguity. - Line 589: replace "New label" with "A new label format" [Fatai] Accepted. - Line 636: replace "some" with "sufficient" [Fatai] Accepted. - Lines 639-641: drop lines (seems redundant with following paragraph) [Fatai] Accepted and dropped. - Line 686: your usage of "just" is a bit odd, how about replace "be just switched" with "restricted to switching" [Fatai] Accepted. - Line 688: similarly how about replace "just terminated" to "restricted to termination" [Fatai] Accepted. - lines 714-719, probably should have a reference to [rfc4201] [Fatai] Accepted. - Line 879: Replace "contrary" with "opposite" or "reverse" [Fatai] Accepted. - Line 888. I suggest adding "Although, this is not greater than the risks presented by the existing OTN control plane as defined by [RFC4203] and [RFC4328]." [Fatai] Accepted. - Lines 888-890, I suggest dropping the sentence starting with "The data plane technology..." for multiple reasons, not least of which is that the ITU-T owns the data plane so the comment is completely out of scope. [Fatai] Accepted. - Lines 1081/2: The whole document is non-normative, so just drop this sentence. [Fatai] Accepted. That's it on this document. Lou On 10/8/2012 4:47 PM, Lou Berger wrote: > This mail begins a two week working group last call on: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09 > (Informational) > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-04 > (Informational) > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709v3-03 > (Standards Track) > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-04 > (Standards Track) > > This working group last call ends on October 22. Comments should be > sent to the CCAMP mailing list. Please remember to include the > technical basis for any comments. > > Please note that we're still missing a few IPR statements, and look > for these to come in during the LC period. Any forthcoming publication > request will be delayed by late IPR statements/disclosures. > > Thank you, > Lou (and Deborah) > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > > > > _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
- [CCAMP] WG Last Call: g709-framework, g709-info-m… Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp… Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp… Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp… Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp… Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: g709-framework, g709-in… Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ie… Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ie… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on draf… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on draf… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- [CCAMP] Fwd: Re: 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on… Huub van Helvoort
- [CCAMP] 答复: 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on draf… Fatai Zhang
- [CCAMP] 答复: 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on draf… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] 答复: 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on … Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on … Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments… Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments… Fatai Zhang
- [CCAMP] 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ie… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Gruman, Fred
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… John E Drake
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Daniele Ceccarelli
- [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was: WG… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Gruman, Fred
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Gruman, Fred
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Gruman, Fred
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] Fwd: RE: Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-c… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Khuzema Pithewan
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Fatai Zhang
- [CCAMP] R: Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was:… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- [CCAMP] R: Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was:… BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Rajan Rao
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding (was… Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] R: Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [CCAMP] R: Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] R: R: Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [CCAMP] R: R: Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] R: R: R: Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding John E Drake
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Fred Gruman
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Fatai Zhang
- [CCAMP] R: Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Daniele Ceccarelli
- [CCAMP] R: Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
- Re: [CCAMP] R: Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding Gruman, Fred