IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] draft test and processing plan for the IETF Codec

Anisse Taleb <anisse.taleb@huawei.com> Mon, 18 April 2011 11:11 UTC

Return-Path: <anisse.taleb@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07536E079D for <codec@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 04:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.028
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.571, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t71IZucoe+GJ for <codec@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 04:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrga02-in.huawei.com (lhrga02-in.huawei.com [195.33.106.143]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D73EE06E0 for <codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 04:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrga02-in [172.18.7.45]) by lhrga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LJU00ERVHRT0A@lhrga02-in.huawei.com> for codec@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:11:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LHREML201-EDG.china.huawei.com ([172.18.7.118]) by lhrga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPS id <0LJU00M7GHRTDA@lhrga02-in.huawei.com> for codec@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:11:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.31) by LHREML201-EDG.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.188) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:11:49 +0100
Received: from LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::f93f:958b:5b06:4f36]) by LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:11:52 +0100
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:11:50 +0000
From: Anisse Taleb <anisse.taleb@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <BANLkTikS2i2NZW47hZGpHK47cGwOYpOOMA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.220.139.57]
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Message-id: <F5AD4C2E5FBF304ABAE7394E9979AF7C26BC87B0@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Thread-topic: [codec] draft test and processing plan for the IETF Codec
Thread-index: AQHL/blqvWaTi5WHb0SotbefuDKFLg==
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
References: <F5AD4C2E5FBF304ABAE7394E9979AF7C26BC684E@LHREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com> <BANLkTikS2i2NZW47hZGpHK47cGwOYpOOMA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "codec@ietf.org" <codec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [codec] draft test and processing plan for the IETF Codec
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:11:56 -0000

Dear Roman,

> 1. You are specifying that Opus should be better than G.722 56Kb, even though the plan calls for no tests 
> against G.722 56 Kb. I would suggest removing the criteria.
> 2. You are also specifying that Opus should be better then G.722 for wideband. I think it should be relaxed
> to "no worse then". I am not sure expecting better quality on wideband voice samples is realistic.

Your proposal sounds good to me. Expect these to change in the next version. 

Thanks for spotting these.

Kind regards,
/Anisse

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email