Re: Syntax

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Wed, 10 January 2007 22:01 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4lW7-0004eV-30; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:01:55 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4lW5-0004eQ-4y for cosmogol@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:01:53 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4lW3-0006aY-Sh for cosmogol@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:01:53 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H4lW2-0008B1-Jp for cosmogol@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:01:50 +0100
Received: from du-001-151.access.de.clara.net ([212.82.227.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <cosmogol@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:01:50 +0100
Received: from nobody by du-001-151.access.de.clara.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <cosmogol@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:01:50 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cosmogol@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:01:25 +0100
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <45A56235.58F6@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <45A129E9.50905@gmx.de> <20070107205255.GA14621@sources.org> <45A20F62.9060306@gmx.de> <20070108204618.GA29407@sources.org> <20070109000704.GB17340@finch-staff-1.thus.net> <20070109081753.GA1875@nic.fr> <20070110055950.GA5608@finch-staff-1.thus.net> <20070110083434.GB24390@nic.fr> <20070110104810.GB32555@finch-staff-1.thus.net> <45A55C70.283F@xyzzy.claranet.de> <45A560A3.1080108@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: du-001-151.access.de.clara.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Subject: Re: Syntax
X-BeenThere: cosmogol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: DIscussion on state machine specification in IETF protocols <cosmogol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/cosmogol>
List-Post: <mailto:cosmogol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol>, <mailto:cosmogol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cosmogol-bounces@ietf.org

Julian Reschke wrote:

> I'd really suggest that we defer this problem until later, when more
> implementor feedback is available. Let's focus for now on the key
> features (and I don't think I18N is one of them).

+1 (as proposed in another article)

I wanted to show that "not complicated" isn't the same as "neglible".

Frank



_______________________________________________
Cosmogol mailing list
Cosmogol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmogol