Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) OptionsforDHCPv6

Danny Mayer <mayer@ntp.org> Mon, 26 November 2007 03:59 UTC

Return-path: <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IwV8B-0000aM-Gj; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:59:35 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IwV8A-0000aH-0E for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:59:34 -0500
Received: from mx04.gis.net ([208.218.130.12]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IwV86-0000gH-Ol for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:59:33 -0500
Received: from [10.10.10.101] ([63.209.224.211]) by mx04.gis.net; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:58:54 -0500
Message-ID: <474A43DB.1010009@ntp.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:56:11 -0500
From: Danny Mayer <mayer@ntp.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Utterback <Brian.Utterback@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) OptionsforDHCPv6
References: <200711260009.lAQ092va059077@drugs.dv.isc.org> <EF06E977-C3D9-4EDF-A126-6CD888BA8F36@fugue.com> <014d01c82fc6$6b1ecd70$6401a8c0@tsg1> <5C093633-A256-4059-AA10-1800F62F522A@fugue.com> <017901c82fd4$9cad3b70$6401a8c0@tsg1> <474A3297.5040907@sun.com> <018401c82fd7$9f632c50$6401a8c0@tsg1> <474A3C32.1020006@sun.com>
In-Reply-To: <474A3C32.1020006@sun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, TS Glassey <tglassey@earthlink.net>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, "Richard Gayraud (rgayraud)" <rgayraud@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

Brian Utterback wrote:
> TS Glassey wrote:
>>
>> I still don't know that the service is needed I have heard a couple of
>> people mandate that they think this is necessary but in actuality I
>> still haven't heard anything that makes this mandatory. Especially
>> since without any pain at all its pretty easy to create a set of known
>> NTP servers and just use the local DNS service to propagate these. WKS
>> inside of DNS is a simple method that is time tested.
>>
>> Todd
> 
> Okay, so your suggestion is to not have a DHCP NTP field at all, but to
> have
> the clients use WKS and DNS resolution to find servers. Fair enough.
> 
> blu

Actually SRV records are what should get used. WKS is rather obsolete.

Danny

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg